Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Explaining the democratic anchorage of governance networks: Evidence from four European countries

By Chris Skelcher, Erik-Hans Klijn, Daniel Kubler, Eva Sorensen and Helen Sullivan

Abstract

Advances in understanding the democratic anchorage of governance networks require carefully designed and contextually grounded empirical analysis that take into account contextual factors. The article uses a conjectural framework to study the impact of the national ‘democratic milieu’ on the relationship between network governance and representative institutions in four European countries - the United Kingdom, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Denmark. The article shows that the distinction between majoritarian and consensus democracy, as well as the varying strength of voluntary associations are important contextual factors that help understand cross-national differences in the relationship between governance networks and representative institutions. We conclude that a context of weak associationalism in majoritarian democracies facilitates the instrumentalization of networks by governmental actors (United Kingdom), whereas while in consensus democracies a more complementary role of governance networks prevails (Switzerland). However, in consensus democracies characterised by a context of strong associationalism (the Netherlands and Denmark), the spread of governance networks in public policy-making is likely to lead to more substantial transformations of the democratic processes

Topics: JN Political institutions (Europe)
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.bham.ac.uk:789

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.