Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The Impact of Scientific Journals of Communication: Comparing Google Scholar Metrics, Web of Science and Scopus

By Rafael Repiso-Caballero and Emilio Delgado-López-Cózar


Google Scholar Metrics' launch in April 2012, a new bibliometric tool for the evaluation of scientific journals by means of citation counting, has ended with the duopoly exerted by the Web of Science and Scopus databases. This paper aims at comparing the coverage of these three databases and the similarity their journal rankings may have. We selected a sample of journals from the field of Communication Studies indexed in the three databases. Data was recollected on 1720 November, 2012. 277 journals were identified to which we calculated their hindex and ranked them according to such indicator. Then, we analyzed the correlation between the rankings generated. Google Scholar Metrics dobles the coverage of the other databases, reducing the bias toward English language both; web of Science and Scopus have. Google Scholar Metrics shows higher hindex values (an average 47% higher than Scopus and 40% higher than Web of Science), allowing to better rank journals. We conclude that Google Scholar Metrics is a tool capable of identifying the main journals in Communication Studies offering results as reliable and valid as the ones Web of Science and Scopus show

Topics: BB. Bibliometric methods
Publisher: Grupo Comunicar
Year: 2013
DOI identifier: 10.3916/C41-2013-04
OAI identifier:
Provided by: E-LIS

Suggested articles


  1. (2009). A Compa -rative Network Analysis of KSJCS and ICA in the Era of Hybri -dization.
  2. (2009). A Google Scholar H-index for Journals: An Alternative Metric to Measure Journal Impact in Economics and Business.
  3. (2005). A Hirsch-type Index for Journals. The Sciencist,
  4. A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures.
  5. (1988). Citation Patterns of Core Communication Jour -nals: An Assessment of the Developmental Status of Commu nica -tion.
  6. (1995). Citation Relationships among International Mass Communication Journals.
  7. (2010). Citations to the «Introduction to Informetrics» Indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar.
  8. (2009). Com -parisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals.
  9. (1999). Communication Theory as a Field. Com mu -nication Theory,
  10. (2003). Discursive Origins of a Communication Dis -cipline. Annual Convention of the National Comunication Asso -ciations.
  11. (2012). Es posible usar Google Scholar para evaluar a las revistas científicas nacionales en los ámbitos de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas? El caso de las revistas españolas.
  12. (2012). Goo -gle Scholar Metrics revisado: Ahora empieza a ir en serio. EC3 Working Papers,
  13. (2012). Goo -gle Scholar Metrics: an unreliable tool for assessing scientific journals.
  14. (2012). Google Scholar Metrics for Publications: The Software and Content Features of a New Open Access Biblio -metric Service. Information Review,
  15. (2009). H-Index: A Review focused in its Variants, Computation and Standardization for Different Scientific Fields.
  16. (2009). How Are New Citation based Journal Indicators Adding to the Bibliometric Toolbox?
  17. (2010). In tro duc -ción y estudio comparativo de los nuevos indicadores de citación sobre revistas científicas en Journal Citation Reports y Scopus.
  18. (2012). Jour -nal Scholar: Una alternativa internacional, gratuita y de libre acceso para medir el impacto de las revistas de Arte, Humanidades y Cien -cias Sociales. EC3 Working Papers,
  19. (2009). Knowledge Linkage Structures in Communication Studies Using Citation Analysis among Communication Journals.
  20. (2012). Las revistas españolas de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas en Google Scho -lar Metrics, ¿están todas las que son? EC3 Working Papers,
  21. (2007). m u n i c a r , ,
  22. (2008). Measuring the Reputation and Productivity of Communication Programs.
  23. (2005). National Diversity of Major International Journals in the Field of Communication.
  24. (2011). Ranking Disciplinary Journals with the Google Scholar h-index: A New Tool for Constructing Cases for Tenure, Promotion, and Other Professional Decisions.
  25. (2008). Ranking Forestry Journals Using the H-in -dex.
  26. (2010). Rankings and Trends in Citation Patterns
  27. Rankings of LIS Faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar.
  28. (2012). Re -positories in Google Scholar Metrics or what is this Document Type Doing in a Place as Such?
  29. (2006). The Evaluative Use of Citation Analysis for Communication Journals.
  30. (2010). The Hirsch Index and Related Impact Measures.
  31. (2004). The Use of Bibliometrics
  32. (2006). Three Options for Citation Tracking: Google Scholar,
  33. (2008). Which h-index? A Comparison of WoS,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.