Evaluation of Methods for Sizing and Counting of Ultrasound Contrast Agents


A precise, accurate and well documented method for the sizing and counting of microbubbles is essential for all aspects of quantitative microbubble-enhanced ultrasound imaging. The efficacy of (a) electro-impedance volumetric zone sensing (ES) also called a Coulter counter/multisizer; (b) optical microscopy (OM); and (c) laser diffraction (LD), for the sizing and counting of microbubbles was assessed. Microspheres with certified mean diameter and number concentration were used to assess sizing and counting reproducibility (precision) and reliability (accuracy) of ES, OM and LD. SonoVueTM was repeatedly (n 5 3) sized and counted to validate ES, OM and LD sizing and counting efficacy. Statistical analyses of intra-method variability for the SonoVueTM mean diameter showed that the best microbubble sizing reproducibility was obtained usingOMwith a mean diameter sizing variability of 1.1%, compared with a variability of 4.3% for ES and 7.1% for LD. The best microbubble counting reproducibility was obtained using ES with a number concentration variability of 8.3%, compared with a variability of 22.4% forOMand 32% for LD. This study showed that no method is fully suited to both sizing and counting of microbubbles

Similar works

Full text


UCL Discovery

Provided a free PDF
oaioai:eprints.ucl.ac.uk.OAI2:1398676Last time updated on 9/10/2013View original full text link

This paper was published in UCL Discovery.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.