Article thumbnail

Informal Fallacies as Cognitive Heuristics in Public Health Reasoning

By Louise Cummings

Abstract

The public must make assessments of a range of health-related issues. However, these assessments require scientific know-ledge which is often lacking or ineffectively utilized by the public. Lay people must use whatever cognitive resources are at their disposal to come to judgement on these issues. It will be contended that a group of arguments—so-called informal fallacies—are a valuable cognitive resource in this regard. These arguments serve as cognitive heuristics which facilitate reasoning when knowledge is limited or beyond the grasp of reasoners. The results of an investigation into the use of these arguments by the public are reported

Topics: Argument from Authority, Argument from Ignorance, Cognitive Heuristic, Informal Fallacies, Public Health, Reasoning, Logic, BC1-199
Publisher: University of Windsor
Year: 2014
DOI identifier: 10.22329/il.v34i1.3801
OAI identifier: oai:doaj.org/article:54eb1caa72f94c78b37d4fccaa712af1
Journal:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • https://doaj.org/toc/0824-2577 (external link)
  • https://doaj.org/toc/0824-2577 (external link)
  • https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/le... (external link)
  • https://doaj.org/article/54eb1... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.