Location of Repository

Compositional data analysis in archaeometry

By MJ Baxter, CC Beardah, HEM Cool and CM Jackson
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:irep.ntu.ac.uk:25422

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1999). Alteration and contamination of archaeological ceramics – the perturbation problem: doi
  2. (1976). Application of multivariate techniques to analytical data on Aegean ceramics: doi
  3. (2002). Biplots of compositional data: doi
  4. (1993). Comment on D.Tangri doi
  5. (2003). Compositional data analysis of archaeological glass – problems and possible solutions: (in preparation).
  6. (1999). Determining pottery provenance – application of a new high-precision X-ray fluorescence method and comparison with instrumental neutron activation analysis: doi
  7. (1978). Elemental analysis of pottery in the study of its provenance – a review: doi
  8. (1994). Exploratory multivariate analysis in archaeology: doi
  9. (2003). Further studies in the compositional variability of colourless Romano-British glass: (in preparation). doi
  10. (1993). Multivariate analysis of compositional data: applied comparisons favour standard principal components analysis over Aitchison’s loglinear contrast method: doi
  11. (1989). Multivariate analysis of data on glass compositions: a methodological note: doi
  12. (1983). neutron activation analysis of black-glazed pottery from Carthage: Archaeometry v. 25, doi
  13. (2002). Ratio maps and correspondence analysis: Departament d’Economia i Empresa, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Working Paper 598.
  14. (2002). Some comments on compositional data analysis in archaeometry, in particular the fallacies in Tangri and Wright’s dismissal of logratio analysis: doi
  15. (1986). The statistical analysis of compositional data: doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.