Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Cortical Mechanisms for the Segregation and Representation of Acoustic Textures

By Tobias Overath, Sukhbinder Kumar, Lauren Stewart, Katharina von Kriegstein, Rhodri Cusack, Adrian Rees and Timothy D. Griffiths


Auditory object analysis requires two fundamental perceptual processes: the definition of the boundaries between objects, and the abstraction and maintenance of an object's characteristic features. Although it is intuitive to assume that the detection of the discontinuities at an object's boundaries precedes the subsequent precise representation of the object, the specific underlying cortical mechanisms for segregating and representing auditory objects within the auditory scene are unknown. We investigated the cortical bases of these two processes for one type of auditory object, an “acoustic texture,” composed of multiple frequency-modulated ramps. In these stimuli, we independently manipulated the statistical rules governing (1) the frequency–time space within individual textures (comprising ramps with a given spectrotemporal coherence) and (2) the boundaries between textures (adjacent textures with different spectrotemporal coherences). Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we show mechanisms defining boundaries between textures with different coherences in primary and association auditory cortices, whereas texture coherence is represented only in association cortex. Furthermore, participants' superior detection of boundaries across which texture coherence increased (as opposed to decreased) was reflected in a greater neural response in auditory association cortex at these boundaries. The results suggest a hierarchical mechanism for processing acoustic textures that is relevant to auditory object analysis: boundaries between objects are first detected as a change in statistical rules over frequency–time space, before a representation that corresponds to the characteristics of the perceived object is formed

Publisher: Society for Neuroscience
Year: 2010
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. doi
  2. (1988). A selective impairment of motion perceptionfollowinglesionsofthemiddletemporalvisualarea(MT).JNeurosci 8:2201–2211.
  3. (1998). Acoustic phonetics.
  4. (2000). Adirectquantitativerelationshipbetween the functional properties of human and macaque V5.
  5. (2003). An evaluation of the use of magnetic field maps to undistort echo-planar images. doi
  6. (2001). Auditory and visual objects. doi
  7. (1995). Auditory grouping. In:Handbook of perception and cognition,
  8. (2008). Auditory temporal edge detection in human auditory cortex. doi
  9. (1995). Auditorygrouping.In:Handbookofperception and cognition, Vol 6,
  10. (1992). Auditorysegregationofcompetingvoices: absence of effects of FM or AM coherence.
  11. (2001). Brain areas sensitive to coherent visual motion. Perception 30:61–72. doi
  12. (2001). Changeinpatternofongoingneural activity with auditory category learning.
  13. (1991). Discriminating between coherent and incoherent frequency modulation of complex tones. doi
  14. (2008). Encoding of spectral correlation over time in auditory cortex. doi
  15. (1999). Event-related fMRI of the auditory cortex. doi
  16. (1999). Event-relatedfMRIof the auditory cortex.
  17. (2008). Feedforward andrecurrentprocessinginscenesegmentation:electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging. doi
  18. Frackowiak RS (1995a) Spatial registration and normalisation of images. doi
  19. Frackowiak RS (1995b) Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. doi
  20. (2005). Hierarchical and asymmetric temporal sensitivity in human auditory cortices. doi
  21. (2003). KrumbholzK,PattersonRD,Seither-PreislerA,LammertmannC,Lu ¨tkenho ¨ner B
  22. (2007). Na ¨a ¨ta ¨nen R
  23. (2003). Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center inHeschl’s gyrus.
  24. (2008). Neurons and objects: the case of auditory cortex. doi
  25. (2004). Optimization of the 3D MDEFT sequence for anatomical brain imaging: technical implications at 1.5 doi
  26. (2003). Perceptual asymmetries in audition. doi
  27. (2007). Processing asymmetry of transitions between order and disorder in human auditory cortex. doi
  28. (2008). Processing of complex sounds in the auditory system. doi
  29. (2004). Processing of complex stimuli and natural scenes in the auditory cortex. doi
  30. (2005). Processing of dynamic spectral properties of sounds. doi
  31. (2004). Processing of frequency-modulated sounds in the lateral auditory belt cortex of the Rhesus monkey. doi
  32. (2007). Processingasymmetry of transitions between order and disorder in human auditory cortex.
  33. (1998). Responses to timevarying stimuli in rat auditory cortex. Hear Res 123:27–30. doi
  34. (2010). Segregation and Representation of Acoustic Textures doi
  35. (1989). Segregation of concurrent sounds. I. Effects of frequency-modulation coherence. doi
  36. (1985). Sensitivity of cat primary auditorycortex (A1) neurons to the direction and rate of frequency modulation. doi
  37. (1992). Sensitivity of neurons in cat primary auditory cortex to tones and frequency-modulated stimuli. I: Effect of variation of stimulus parameters. Hear Res 63:108–134. doi
  38. (2004). Sensitivity to auditory object features in human temporal neocortex. doi
  39. (1999). Sparse” temporal sampling in auditory fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 7:213–223. doi
  40. (2005). Speech-specific auditory processing: where is it? Trends Cogn Sci 9:271–276. doi
  41. (1992). The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance.
  42. (1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. doi
  43. (2002). Thresholding of statistical maps in functional imaging using the false discovery rate. doi
  44. (2009). Unraveling the principles of auditory cortical processing: can we learn from the visual system? doi
  45. (2009). Unravelingtheprinciplesofauditorycorticalprocessing: can we learn from the visual system?
  46. (2004). What is an auditory object?

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.