Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Soviet montage cinema as propaganda and political rhetoric

By Michael Russell


Most previous studies of Soviet montage cinema have concentrated on\ud its aesthetic and technical aspects; however, montage cinema was essentially\ud a rhetoric rather than an aesthetic of cinema. This thesis presents a comparative\ud study of the leading montage film-makers – Kuleshov, Pudovkin,\ud Eisenstein and Vertov – comparing and contrasting the differing methods\ud by which they used cinema to exert a rhetorical effect on the spectator for\ud the purposes of political propaganda.\ud The definitions of propaganda in general use in the study of Soviet\ud montage cinema are too narrowly restrictive and a more nuanced definition\ud is clearly needed. Furthermore, the role of the spectator in constituting the\ud rhetorical effectivity of a montage film has been neglected; a psychoanalytic\ud model of the way in which the filmic text can trigger a change in the\ud spectator’s psyche is required. Moreover, the ideology of the Soviet montage\ud films is generally assumed to exist only in their content, whereas in classical\ud cinema ideology also operates at the level of the enunciation of the filmic\ud text itself. The extent to which this is also true for Soviet montage cinema\ud should be investigated.\ud I have analysed the interaction between montage films and their spectators\ud from multiple perspectives, using several distinct but complementary\ud theoretical approaches, including recent theories of propaganda, a psychoanalytic\ud model of rhetoric, Lacanian psychoanalysis and the theory of the\ud system of the suture, and Peircean semiotics. These different theoretical\ud approaches, while having distinct conceptual bases, work together to build\ud a new and consistent picture of montage cinema as a propaganda medium\ud and as a form of political rhetoric.\ud I have been able to classify the films of Kuleshov, Eisenstein and Pudovkin\ud as transactive, vertical agitation propaganda and the films of Vertov\ud as transactive, horizontal agitation propaganda. Furthermore, I show that\ud montage cinema embeds ideology in the enunciation of its filmic text, but\ud differs from classical cinema in trying to subvert the suturing process. I\ud conclude that Vertov at least partly created a non-representational cinematography\ud and that he could be regarded as being at least as much a\ud Suprematist film-maker as a Constructivist one

Topics: cinema, film, Soviet, montage, Kuleshov, Lev, Eisenstein, Sergei 1898-1948, Pudovkin, Vsevold Illarionovich 1893-1953, Vertov, Dziga 1896-1954, Malevich, Kazimir Severinovich 1878-1935
Publisher: The University of Edinburgh
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2006). A Prolegomenon to the Future Study of Rhetoric and Propaganda: Critical Foundations.” In:
  2. (1971). A Short History of the Movies. doi
  3. (1986). Aleksandr Rodchenko: The Complete Work. doi
  4. (1968). And Faces are Painted on the Screens.” In: Troels Andersen
  5. (1987). Benjamin, Cinema and Experience: ‘The Blue Flower in the doi
  6. (1988). Chapter two.” In: Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research.
  7. (2001). Cinema and Soviet Society from the Revolution to the Death of Stalin. London:
  8. (2000). Cinema Studies: The Key Concepts. 2nd edition. doi
  9. (1987). Constructivism in Film: The Man with the Movie Camera. A Cinematic Analysis. Cambridge: doi
  10. (1994). Down to Earth: Aelita relocated.” In: Inside the Film Factory: New approaches to Russian and Soviet cinema. doi
  11. (1978). Dziga Vertov as Theorist.” doi
  12. (1977). Dziga Vertov: A Futurist with a doi
  13. (2007). Dziga Vertov: Defining Documentary Film. London: doi
  14. (2006). Dziga Vertov. The Vertov Collection at the Austrian Film Museum. doi
  15. (1998). Early Cinema in Russia and its Cultural Reception. Chicago: doi
  16. (1990). Early Cinema: Space, doi
  17. (1976). Early Griffith: doi
  18. (1994). Early Russian cinema: some observations.”
  19. (2000). Early Soviet Cinema: Innovation, Ideology and Propaganda. doi
  20. (1977). Écrits: A Selection. doi
  21. (1978). Eisenstein’s Later Work at the Proletkult.” The Drama Review doi
  22. (1972). Eisenstein’s Potemkin: A shot-by-shot presentation.
  23. (1977). Evolution of Style in the Early Work of Dziga Vertov.
  24. (1987). Fifty Years in Films. doi
  25. (1977). Film Form: Essays in Film Theory.
  26. (1982). Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema. doi
  27. (1998). Film Propaganda: Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany. 2nd revised edition. doi
  28. (1977). Film style and technology in the forties.” doi
  29. (2006). Film Theory: An Introduction. 2nd edition. Manchester: doi
  30. (2000). For the Voice, doi
  31. (1999). Forward Soviet! History and Non-fiction Film in the USSR. doi
  32. (1980). Frederick W. Taylor and the Rise of Scientific Management. doi
  33. (1970). Griffith: The Years at Biograph.
  34. (1986). Griffith’s Intolerance: Its Genesis and Its Vision.
  35. (1971). History and Class Consciousness. doi
  36. (1970). How are Verses Made? doi
  37. (1999). Ideological Effects of the Basic Cinematographic Apparatus.” In: Leo Braudy and doi
  38. (1983). Immoral Memories. An Autobiography. doi
  39. (2002). Incitement and Thought: The Texts of Malevich.” In: Malevich and Film. doi
  40. (1990). Intertitles to ‘Three Songs of Lenin,’ doi
  41. (1979). Intolerance and the Soviets: a Historical Investigation.” Wide Angle 1: 22–27.BIBLIOGRAPHY 259 ———.
  42. (1990). Jacques Lacan: A Feminist Introduction. doi
  43. (1984). Kino-Eye: the Writings of Dziga Vertov. doi
  44. (1974). Kuleshov on Film: Writings by Lev Kuleshov. doi
  45. (1991). Kuleshov’s experiments and the new anthropology of the actor.” In: Inside the Film Factory: New approaches to Russian and Soviet cinema. doi
  46. (1986). L’Effet Koulechov existe-t-il?” IRIS.
  47. (2001). Lenin and Philosophy and other essays. doi
  48. (1995). Lenin, Hegel and Western Marxism: A Critical Study. doi
  49. (1979). Lessons with Eisenstein.
  50. (1978). Letter to Moholy-Nagy.” In: Troels Andersen
  51. (1977). Linguistic Models in Early Soviet doi
  52. (1985). Literature, Psychoanalysis, and the Re-Formation of the Self: A New Direction for Reader-Response Theory.” doi
  53. (1978). Majakovskij and Eisenstein Celebrate the Tenth Anniversary.” The Slavic and East doi
  54. (2002). Malevich and Film. doi
  55. (1978). Malevich’s Painting –
  56. (1978). Marx-Engels Reader. 2nd edition. doi
  57. (1973). Marxist Esthetics. doi
  58. (1972). Mayakovsky and His Circle. doi
  59. (1988). Media Power: The Double Bind.” In: Alan Rosenthal (editor), New Challenges for the Documentary. Berkeley:
  60. (1987). Montage Eisenstein. doi
  61. (2006). Montaging Pushkin: Pushkin and Visions of Modernity in Russian Twentieth-Century Poetry.
  62. (1992). Movies for the Masses: Popular Cinema and Soviet Society in the 1920s. Cambridge: doi
  63. (1970). Notes of a Film Director.
  64. (2008). On Ideology. doi
  65. (2002). Painterly Laws in the Problems of Cinema.” In: Malevich and Film.
  66. (1991). Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotics. doi
  67. (1959). Personality and Persuadability. New Haven CT:
  68. (1976). Philosophical Notebooks,
  69. (2008). Poetry of Labor and Labor of Poetry: The doi
  70. (1971). Politics and Film.
  71. (2004). Politics and Propaganda. Manchester: doi
  72. (1971). Problems in General Linguistics. doi
  73. (1989). Procedures of Montage in Isaak Babel’s Red Cavalry. doi
  74. (1992). Propaganda and Persuasion. 2nd edition. doi
  75. (1973). Propaganda: the Formation of Men’s Attitudes.
  76. (1989). Propaganda.” In: doi
  77. (1974). Pudovkin’s Films and Film Theory.
  78. (1981). Questions of Cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.BIBLIOGRAPHY 258 Elizabeth Henderson.
  79. (1997). Rhetoric and Representation in Nonfiction Film. Cambridge: doi
  80. (2007). Savage Junctures: Sergei Eisenstein and the Shape of Thinking. London: doi
  81. (2006). Selected Essays.
  82. (1988). Selected Works Volume I: Writings 1922-34. doi
  83. (1991). Selected Works Volume II: Towards a Theory of Montage. London:
  84. (2000). Selected Writings. 2nd edition. doi
  85. (1985). Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory. doi
  86. (1997). Signs and Meaning in the Cinema. 2nd revised edition.
  87. (1990). Silent Witnesses: Russian Films, doi
  88. (1948). Soviet Cinema.
  89. (1973). Teenage Artists of the Revolution.” In:
  90. (1986). The ‘Kuleshov Effect’ Effect.” IRIS.
  91. The Artist and the Cinema.” In: Troels Andersen
  92. (1985). The Birth of the Propaganda State: Soviet Methods of Mass Mobilization, 1917-1929. Cambridge: doi
  93. (1979). The Camera-Eye and the Film:
  94. (2005). The Cinema of Eisenstein. doi
  95. (1985). The classical Hollywood style, 1917-60.” In: The Classical Hollywood Cinema: doi
  96. (1974). The Complete Films of Eisenstein.
  97. (2003). The End of St. doi
  98. (1985). The formulation of the classical style, 1909-28.” In: The Classical Hollywood Cinema: doi
  99. (1972). The Idea of Montage in Soviet Art and Film.” doi
  100. (1979). The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema. doi
  101. (1968). The Immediate Tasks of the Soviet Government.” In: Selected Works.
  102. (2000). The Man with the Movie Camera. doi
  103. (1973). The Origins of Montage.” In:
  104. (1979). The Politics of Soviet Cinema 1917-1929. Cambridge: doi
  105. (1992). The Red Screen: Politics, Society, Art in Soviet Society. doi
  106. (1996). The rediscovery of a Kuleshov experiment: a dossier.”
  107. (1961). The Stage Antecedents of the Film Theory doi
  108. (1987). Thinking in Pictures: doi
  109. (1989). Totem and Taboo. doi
  110. (1989). Transition Through Tension: Stylistic Diversity in doi
  111. (2000). Vsevolod Pudovkin: Classic Films of the Soviet AvantGarde. London: doi
  112. (1988). What is to be Done? London: Penguin.BIBLIOGRAPHY 260 Jay Leyda.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.