Article thumbnail

The Case of the Missing Indigene: Debate Over a “Second-Generation” Ethnic Policy

By Mark Christopher Elliott

Abstract

The last few years have seen a vigorous public policy debate emerge over a “second generation” ethnic policy (di’erdai minzu zhengce) which, if implemented, would constitute a major revision of ethnic politics in China. Despite the fact that nationalities policy is a notoriously sensitive subject within China, the debate is happening openly in newspapers, academic journals and on the Internet. The prominence accorded to anthropological theory and international comparison is a notable feature of the debate. This article first explores the main positions in the ongoing policy discussion, then goes on to argue that, rather than comparing China’s non-Han peoples to minority immigrant populations in the industrialized democracies, a better comparison is to indigenous peoples. It then considers why this perspective is completely missing from the present debate.East Asian Languages and Civilization

Publisher: 'University of Chicago Press'
Year: 2017
DOI identifier: 10.1086/679274.
OAI identifier: oai:dash.harvard.edu:1/34306000
Journal:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:H... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.