Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Conditional inference and advanced mathematical study.

By M. Inglis and A. Simpson


Many mathematicians and curriculum bodies have argued in favour of the theory of formal discipline: that studying advanced mathematics develops one’s ability to reason logically. In this paper we explore this view by directly comparing the inferences drawn from abstract conditional statements by advanced mathematics students and well-educated arts students. The mathematics students in the study were found to endorse fewer invalid conditional inferences than the arts students, but they did not endorse significantly more valid inferences. We establish that both groups tended to endorse more inferences which led to negated conclusions than inferences which led to affirmative conclusions (a phenomenon known as the negative conclusion effect). In contrast, however, we demonstrate that, unlike the arts students, the mathematics students did not exhibit the affirmative premise effect: the tendency to endorse more inferences with affirmative premises than with negated premises. We speculate that this latter result may be due to an increased ability for successful mathematics students to be able to ‘see through’ opaque representations. Overall, our data are consistent with a version of the formal discipline view. However, there are important caveats; in particular, we demonstrate that there is no simplistic relationship between the study of advanced mathematics and conditional inference behaviour

Topics: Advanced mathematical thinking, Conditional inference, Logic, Reasoning, Representation systems, Theory of formal discipline
Publisher: Springer
Year: 2008
DOI identifier: 10.1007/s10649-007-9098-9
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1995). The impact of ‘meaning’ on students’ ability to negate statements’.
  2. (1986). Pragmatic versus Syntactic Approaches to Training Deductive Reasoning’.
  3. (1977). The Interpretation of Statements in Standard Logical Form by Preservice Elementary Teachers’.
  4. 1850/1970, ‘The Logic and Utility of Mathematics’. In:
  5. (1988). The student’s construction of quantification’.
  6. (2003). Which notion of implication is the right one? From logical considerations to a didactic perspective’.
  7. (1974). On Comparing Error Patterns and the Effect of Maturation in a Unit on Sentential Logic’.
  8. (2002). Matching bias and set sizes: A discussion of Yama
  9. (1995). Bias in conditional inference: Implications for mental models and mental logic’.
  10. (1998). Elements of Logic via Numbers and Sets.
  11. (2006). How we reason.
  12. (2004). Visual salience of algebraic transformations’.
  13. (2007). How abstract is symbolic thought?’.
  14. (1987). Rational number relations and proportions’.
  15. (1997). Conditional Reasoning with Realistic Material’. Thinking and Reasoning
  16. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes’.
  17. (2002). Contrast classes and matching bias as explanations of the effects of negation on conditional reasoning’. Thinking and Reasoning
  18. (2007). Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning.
  19. (2000). Probabilities and polarity biases in conditional inference’.
  20. (1972). Logical Thinking in Adolescents’.
  21. (1973). Logical Thinking in College Students’.
  22. (1980). The influence of logic on conditional reasoning performance’.
  23. (1993). Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight’.
  24. (2001). The processing on negations in conditional reasoning: A meta-analytical case study in mental model and/or mental logic theory’. Thinking and Reasoning
  25. (2004). Making Mathematics Count: The report of Professor Adrian Smith’s Inquiry into Post-14 Mathematics Education. London: The Stationery Office.
  26. (1986). The Growing Crisis
  27. (2004). Undergraduate Students’ understanding of the contraposition equivalence rule in symbolic and verbal contexts’.
  28. (1924). Mental discipline in high school studies’.
  29. (1901). The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions’.
  30. (2001). Matching versus optimal data selection in the Wason Selection Task’. Thinking and Reasoning

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.