Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Domestication alone does not lead to inequality : intergenerational wealth transmission among horticulturalists.

By M. Gurven, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, Paul L. Hooper, H. Kaplan, R. Quinlan, R. Sear, E. Schniter, C. von Rueden, S. Bowles, T. Hertz and A. Bell


We present empirical measures of wealth inequality and its intergenerational transmission among four horticulturalist populations. Wealth is construed broadly as embodied somatic and neural capital, including body size, fertility and cultural knowledge, material capital such as land and household wealth, and relational capital in the form of coalitional support and field labor. Wealth inequality is moderate for most forms of wealth, and intergenerational wealth transmission is low for material resources and moderate for embodied and relational wealth. Our analysis suggests that domestication alone does not transform social structure; rather, the presence of scarce, defensible resources may be required before inequality and wealth transmission patterns resemble the familiar pattern in more complex societies. Land ownership based on usufruct and low‐intensity cultivation, especially in the context of other economic activities such as hunting and fishing, is associated with more egalitarian wealth distributions as found among hunter‐gatherers

Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1086/648587
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1996). A theory of fertility and parental investment in traditional and modern human societies. doi
  2. (1970). A theory of the origin of the state.
  3. (1977). African slavery” as an institution of marginality.
  4. (1974). Akwe-Shavante society. doi
  5. (1922). Argonauts of the western doi
  6. (1986). Correlates of reproductive success in a Caribbean village. Human Ecology 14:225–243.
  7. (1996). Differential fertility and body build in !Kung San and Kavango females from northern Namibia. doi
  8. (1995). Differential reproductive success and body dimensions in Kavango males from urban and rural areas in northern Namibia. Human Biology 67:291–309.
  9. (1954). Early forms of society.
  10. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. doi
  11. (1967). Evolution of political society.
  12. (1978). Force and persuasion: leadership in an Amazonian society. Chicago: doi
  13. (2002). From forest to reservation: transitions in food sharing behavior among the Ache of Paraguay.
  14. (1985). Good company and violence: sorcery and social action in a lowland New Guinea society. doi
  15. (2006). How long does it take to become a proficient hunter? implications for the evolution of delayed growth.
  16. (2006). Hunting, social status and biological fitness. Social Biology 53:81–99.
  17. (2009). Intergenerational wealth transmission and the dynamics of inequality in small-scale societies.
  18. (1969). Kinship and the social order.
  19. (1988). Life histories, blood revenge and warfare in a tribal population.
  20. (1988). Marriage and inequality in classless societies.
  21. (2010). Pastoralism and wealth inequality: revisiting an old question.
  22. (1970). Samoa 1830 to 1900: the politics of a multicultural community. Melbourne:
  23. (2007). Seasonal food insecurity and perceived social support in rural Tanzania. Public Health Nutrition 10:544–551.
  24. (2004). The costs and benefits of kin: kin networks and children’s health among the Pimbwe of Tanzania.
  25. (2010). The emergence and persistence of inequality in premodern societies: introduction to the special section.
  26. (1964). The evolution of diversity in avian territorial systems.
  27. (2009). Trade-offs and sexual conflict over women’s fertility preferences in Mpimbwe.
  28. (1996). War before civilization. doi
  29. (2004). Why don’t markets increase economic inequalities? Kuznets in the Bush. Human Ecology 32:339–364.
  30. (1968). Yanomamo: the fierce people.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.