Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Understanding the relationship between span of control and subordinate consensus in leader-member exchange.

By B. Schyns, J.M. Maslyn and J. Weibler

Abstract

Leader-member exchange (LMX) refers to the relationship quality a leader shares with members of his or her work group, typically described as differentiation in quality within the group. Numerous empirical studies demonstrate that the quality of this relationship is positively related to followers' attitudes and organizational outcomes. It has been proposed that the quality of possible relationships between the leader and the led will be affected by the number of employees directly reporting to the leader, with empirical findings showing a slight negative relationship between span of control and LMX. Little is known, however, about how span of control influences variability in the quality of leader-member exchange within the context of work groups. Therefore, following a recognized assumption to strive for as many as possible leadership relations on a high LMX level, we examine how individual- and group-level (consensus in) LMX can be based on different dimensions of the LMX relationship. We suggest how LMX consensus and a high LMX level can be established even in large spans of control

Topics: Leadership, Span of control.
Publisher: Psychology Press
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1080/13594320903146485
OAI identifier: oai:dro.dur.ac.uk.OAI2:7866
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach.
  2. (2006). Are group consensus in LMX and shared work values related to organizational outcomes?
  3. (2003). Back to basics: Applying a parent perspective to transformational leadership. doi
  4. (2002). Co-worker exchange: Relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes.
  5. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects of representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior.
  6. (1992). Development and preliminary validation of a new scale (LMX-6) to measure Leader-Member Exchange in organizations.
  7. (1995). Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Understanding The Relationship Between Span of Control And Leader-Member Exchange Leadership Quarterly,
  8. (1995). Differential superior-subordinate relations, perceptions of fairness, and co-worker communication.
  9. (1993). Distance in organizations. doi
  10. (2009). Do you see what we see? The complex effects of perceptual distance between leaders and teams.
  11. (2005). Dyadic Leadership and Organizational Outcomes – Different Results of Different Instruments? In:
  12. (1977). Effects of linking-pin quality on the quality of working life of lower participants.
  13. (2008). Follower characteristics and the perception of Leader-Member Exchange.
  14. (2007). Is charisma hyper-romanticism? Empirical evidence from new data and a meta-analysis.
  15. (2006). Leadership and organizational context: Like the weather? doi
  16. (1999). Leadership and organizational justice: Similarities and differences across cultures. doi
  17. (2009). LMX beyond the dyad: Concepts and operations. Panel discussion at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology,
  18. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues.
  19. (1937). Relationship in organization. In:
  20. (1999). Rethinking leader-member exchange: An organizational justice perspective. doi
  21. (2003). Shared leadership in work teams. A social network approach. In
  22. (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks, doi
  23. (2006). Sharing network leadership,
  24. (1970). Situational Influences on the Use of Power.
  25. (1995). Social distance and charisma: Theoretical notes and an exploratory study.
  26. (2001). The folly of theorizing "A" but testing "B" - A selective level-of-analysis review of the field and a detailed Leader-Member Exchange illustration.
  27. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing.
  28. (2000). Transformational leadership and attachment. doi
  29. (2000). Understanding The Relationship Between Span of Control And Leader-Member Exchange doi
  30. (2005). Understanding The Relationship Between Span of Control And Leader-Member Exchange Schyns,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.