Location of Repository

The influence of occupational self-efficacy on the relationship of leadership behavior and preparedness for occupational change.

By B. Schyns

Abstract

A theoretical framework for the relationship between preparedness for occupational change, occupational self-efficacy, and leadership is presented. Preparedness for occupational change is defined as the wish to acquire higher task demands (i.e. greater complexity) in the sense that employees have thought about change but have not yet acted to seek change. It explained why preparedness for occupational change is central prior to, during, and after organizational change is introduced. A model of determinants of preparedness for occupational change is established. The application of this model in different stages of organizational change is demonstrated. Central aspects in this model are self-efficacy and leadership. Self-efficacy influences preparedness for occupational change in the different stages. This effect is demonstrated using the three assumed outcomes of self-efficacy (i.e., initiation of behavior, persistence, and effort) and their relationship to preparedness for occupational change. It is assumed that perceived leadership influences occupational self-efficacy. Three factors influencing self-efficacy (mastery experience, vicarious learning, and verbal persuasion) are regarded as possibly being responsible for this effect. The implications of the model for organizational practice are discussed

Topics: Preparedness for occupational change, Organizational change, Self-efficacy, Leadership.
Publisher: Sage
Year: 2004
DOI identifier: 10.1177/089484530403000402
OAI identifier: oai:dro.dur.ac.uk.OAI2:7881
Journal:

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1992). Changing organizations by changing individuals: A model of leadership training.
  2. (1999). Charismatic leadership and task feedback: A laboratory study of their effects on self-efficacy and task performance. doi
  3. (1991). Delineating goal and efficacy effects: A test of three models.
  4. (1999). Determinants of delegation and consultation by managers. doi
  5. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies.
  6. (1997). Generalized self-efficacy as a mediator and moderator between control and complexity at work and personal initiative: A longitudinal field study in East Germany. Human Performance, doi
  7. (1993). Implementing group work in the car manufacturing industry: The foreman as a focal factor. In:
  8. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.
  9. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of openness to change in a reorganizing workplace. doi
  10. (2000). Predictors of employee willingness to relocate for the firm.
  11. (1989). Pygmalion goes to work: The effect of supervisor expectations in a retail setting. doi
  12. (2000). Remedial self-fulfilling prophecy: Two field experiments to prevent Golem effects among disadvantaged women.
  13. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization.
  14. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.
  15. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.