Article thumbnail

Predicted rank<sup>1</sup> of correlation coefficients between landscape models and genetic distances.

By J. Nevil Amos (182539), Andrew F. Bennett (182544), Ralph Mac Nally (182547), Graeme Newell (182551), Alexandra Pavlova (182554), James Q. Radford (182557), James R. Thomson (182562), Matt White (182569) and Paul Sunnucks (182576)

Abstract

1<p>Species codes are given in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030888#pone-0030888-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>.</p>2<p>For each species, models are ranked from highest (1) to lowest (7).</p>3<p>The row ranking isolation-by-distance has a rank for the occurrence of isolation-by-distance alone, and ‘strong, weak or none’ for the strength of the isolation-by-distance signal expected, whether or not isolation-by-resistance is also present.</p

Topics: Genetics, Evolutionary Biology, Ecology, coefficients, models
Year: 2012
DOI identifier: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030888.t004
OAI identifier: oai:figshare.com:article/350649
Provided by: FigShare
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • https://figshare.com/articles/... (external link)
  • http://www.plosone.org/article... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.