Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Real world reviews : a beginner’s guide to undertaking systematic reviews of public health policy interventions.

By C. Bambra


Background The systematic review is becoming an increasingly popular and established research method in public health. Obtaining systematic review skills are therefore becoming a common requirement for most public health researchers and practitioners. However, most researchers still remain apprehensive about conducting their first systematic review. This is often because an ‘ideal’ type of systematic review is promoted in the methods literature. \ud \ud Methods This brief guide is intended to help dispel these concerns by providing an accessible overview of a ‘real’ approach to conducting systematic reviews. The guide draws upon an extensive practical experience of conducting various types of systematic reviews of complex social interventions. \ud \ud Results The paper discusses what a systematic review is and how definitions vary. It describes the stages of a review in simple terms. It then draws on case study reviews to reflect on five key practical aspects of the conduct of the method, outlining debates and potential ways to make the method shorter and smarter—enhancing the speed of production of systematic reviews and reducing labour intensity while still maintaining high methodological standards. \ud \ud Conclusion There are clear advantages in conducting the high quality pragmatic reviews that this guide has described: (1) time and labour resources are saved; (2) it enables reviewers to inform or respond to developments in policy and practice in a timelier manner; and (3) it encourages researchers to conduct systematic reviews before embarking on primary research. Well-conducted systematic reviews remain a valuable part of the public health methodological tool box.\u

Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Year: 2011
DOI identifier: 10.1136/jech.2009.088740
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2003). A difficult business: Finding the evidence for social science reviews, Working Paper no 19, London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice.
  2. (2009). Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness
  3. (2003). Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.
  4. (2003). Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: Horses for courses, doi
  5. (2001). Helping people with severe mental illness to obtain work: systematic review.
  6. (2003). New roads and human health: a systematic review. doi
  7. (2008). Population7tobacco control interventions and their effects on social inequalities in smoking: placing an equity lens on existing systematic reviews.
  8. (2000). Prevention of falls in the construction industry: Evidence for program effectiveness.
  9. (2004). Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: a systematic review. doi
  10. (1998). Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. doi
  11. (2001). Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions.
  12. (2005). Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 1. Finding the evidence: how far should you go? doi
  13. (2005). Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 2. Best available evidence: how low should you go?
  14. (1994). Systematic reviews: rationale for systematic reviews. doi
  15. (1998). The lamp-post of research: support or illumination?‟, in A. Oakley and H. Roberts (eds) Evaluating social interventions: a report of two workshops funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, Ilford: Barnardos,
  16. (2003). Traffic calming for the prevention of road traffic injuries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury Prevention, doi
  17. (2003). What are the most effective ways of improving population health through transport interventions? Evidence from systematic reviews.
  18. (2003). Why certain systematic reviews reach uncertain conclusions. doi
  19. (2009). Working for health? Evidence from systematic reviews on the health effects of changes to the psychosocial work environment. Preventive Medicine. Online early.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.