Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

An Evaluation of a Hydrological Model Used to Predict the Impact of Flow Attenuation on Downstream Flood Flows\ud



A number of recent high magnitude events have shown that fluvial flooding has increasingly detrimental impacts on people and properties. There is a perception that flood risk is increasing due to several factors, including urbanisation of floodplains and climate change. This has created a need to assess the potential of using the natural function of floodplains, to slow and temporarily store water, as a means of mitigating downstream flooding.\ud \ud This project applied and assessed a reduced complexity hydrological model called Overflow, which was used to predict the impact of flow attenuation on downstream flood flows. The model behaviour was theoretically consistent with physical processes, allowing it to be calibrated for the River Seven, North Yorkshire for a flood event in June 2007.\ud \ud At the catchment scale, multiple, spatially distributed flow attenuation measures were shown to reduce downstream peak flood flows. However, any individual intervention could have a positive, neutral or negative impact on downstream flooding by affecting the timing and synchronicity of hydrographs from different tributaries. This demonstrated the importance of the specific geographic location of interventions.\ud \ud The results were compared with a hydraulic model, HEC-RAS, which is a standard tool for flood hazard prediction in the UK. HEC-RAS is not without its own uncertainties however, so the aim of the model comparison was to benchmark Overflow against an established model, rather than validating the model with respect to reality. At the reach scale, Overflow was less sensitive to an increase in flow resistance than HEC-RAS, so it will under-predict the effects of flow attenuation. However, Overflow predicted higher magnitude hydrographs than HEC-RAS. This was due to the inclusion of lateral overland flow routing in Overflow, which could not be simulated in HEC-RAS. Further model development is required to integrate Overflow’s predictions of overland flow with boundary conditions for hydraulic models.\ud \ud This thesis therefore provides a framework for the assessment of flow attenuation as a flood risk management tool, in the case of an extreme event, on the River Seven, North Yorkshire

Topics: floods, environmental modelling, Ryedale, North Yorkshire, forestry, river, River Seven, Overflow, hydrology, hydraulic modelling
Year: 2011
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Durham e-Theses

Suggested articles


  1. (2006a) "Urban fluvial flood modelling using a two-dimensional diffusionwave treatment, part 1: mesh resolution effects." doi
  2. (2006b) "Urban fluvial flood modelling using a two-dimensional diffusionwave treatment, part 2: development of a sub-grid-scale treatment." doi
  3. (2007). (2007b) "Pickering."
  4. (2005). (In preparation) "Knowledge-Theoretic Models in Hydrology."
  5. (2007). A comparison of one- and two-dimensional approaches to modelling flood inundation over complex upland floodplains." doi
  6. (2001). A fast, simple and versatile algorithm to fill the depressions of digital elevation models." doi
  7. (1994). A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models." doi
  8. (2008). Agricultural land use and flood risk management: Engaging with stakeholders in North Yorkshire." doi
  9. (2007). An assessment of the impact of floodplain woodland on flood flows." doi
  10. (1982). An introduction to error analysis: the study of uncertainties in physical measurements." Mill Valley, Calif:
  11. (2008). An update of the Foresight Future Flooding
  12. (1996). Analysis and Development of Hydraulic Models for Floodplain Flows." In:
  13. (2007). Aspiration and reality: flood policy, economic damages and the appraisal process." doi
  14. (2000). Assuring the Quality of Models Designed for Predictive Tasks." In:
  15. (1996). Bayesian Estimation of Uncertainty in Runoff Prediction and the Value of Data: An Application of the GLUE Approach." doi
  16. (1989). Changing ideas in hydrology -- The case of physically-based models." doi
  17. (2001). Channel change and flooding, Skokomish River, Washington." doi
  18. (1996). Choosing the best model: Level of detail, complexity, and model performance." doi
  19. (2002). Climate change scenarios for the United Kingdom: The UKCIP02 Scientific Report."
  20. (2005). Comparison of Several Flood Forecasting Models in Yangtze River." doi
  21. (2007). Consulting (2008a) "Rating Check File: 10. Sinnington." Rye and Derwent Forecasting Model Report,
  22. (2007). Consulting (2008b) "Rating Check File: 7. Normanby." Rye and Derwent Forecasting Model Report,
  23. (1986). Criteria for comparison of single event models." doi
  24. (1990). Cross-section location in 1-D models."
  25. debris and controls on total resistance." doi
  26. (2001). Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments." doi
  27. (1999). Effect of Riparian Vegetation on Flow Resistance and Flood Potential." doi
  28. (1990). Engineering Hydrology."
  29. (2009). Environment Agency (2007a) "Yorkshire Derwent Catchment Flood Management Plan." Environment Agency,
  30. (2010). Environment Agency (2010a) "Draft Derwent Catchment Flood Management Plan: Summary Report,
  31. Environment Agency (2010b) "The costs of the summer 2007 floods in England."
  32. (2007). Environmental Modelling: An Introduction." Oxford: doi
  33. (1996). Equifinality and Uncertainty in Geomorphological Models." In:
  34. (2010). Estimating the impact of rural land management changes on catchment runoff generation in England and Wales." doi
  35. (1999). Evaluating the Use of Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Hydrologic and Hydroclimatic Model Validation." doi
  36. (2002). Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation." doi
  37. (2006). Evaluation of the Nash--Sutcliffe Efficiency Index." doi
  38. (2000). Experiments: planning analysis and parameter design optimization." doi
  39. (2007). Exploring equifinality in a landscape evolution model." Ph.D. Thesis,
  40. (1993). Factors Affecting Conveyance in Meandering Compound Flows." doi
  41. (2010). Flood and Water Management Act,." Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs,
  42. (1999). Flood Estimation Handbook: Volume 3, Statistical Procedures for Flood Frequency Estimation." Wallingford: Institute of Hydrology.
  43. (1999). Flood Estimation Handbook: Volume 4, Restatement and application of the Flood Studies Report rainfall-runoff method." Wallingford: Institute of Hydrology.
  44. (2007). Flood Planner: A Manual for the Natural Management of River Floods."
  45. (2005). Flood Risk and Insurance in England and Wales: Are there lessons to be learned from Scotland?"
  46. (2002). Flood risk modelling: a crisis of confidence?" doi
  47. (2000). Flooding and Aquatic Ecosystems." In: doi
  48. (2009). Flooding in England: A National Assessment of Flood Risk." Environment Agency,
  49. (2003). Floodplain modelling using HEC-RAS."
  50. (1988). Flow processes and data provision for channel flow models."
  51. (2006). Flow resistance dynamics in step-pool channels: 2. Partitioning between grain, spill, and woody debris resistance." doi
  52. (2006). Flow resistance dynamics in step-pool stream channels: 1. doi
  53. (2007). Flow resistance equations for gravel- and boulder-bed streams." doi
  54. (2007). Fluvial Systems and Processes." In:
  55. (2004). Foresight, Future Flooding. Scientific Summary: Volume I, Future risks and their drivers."
  56. (2007). Forestry and Flooding." Regional Forestry Strategy for Yorkshire and the Humber, Briefing Note 1. Forestry Commission. Accessed 4/2/10, from$FILE/forestry_and_fl ooding_Dec07.pdf.
  57. (2011). from
  58. (2006). Future flooding and coastal erosion risks." doi
  59. (2008). Geomorphology Fluid Flow Modelling: Can Fluvial Flow Only Be Modelled Using a Three-Dimensional Approach?" doi
  60. (2008). Global Sensitivity Analysis. The Primer." doi
  61. (1992). Ground-water models cannot be validated." doi
  62. (1963). Guide for selecting roughness coefficient "n" values for channels."
  63. (2008). HEC-RAS, River Analysis System Hydraulic Reference Manual." Davis, California, US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center. [Online] Accessed
  64. (2008). HEC-RAS, River Analysis System Hydraulic Reference Manual." Davis, California, US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center. [Online] Accessed th
  65. (2006). How well do facts travel? Cambridge: doi
  66. (1986). Hydraulics and Hydraulic Geometry." doi
  67. (2005). Hydrodynamic and morphodynamic response to river engineering documented by fixed-discharge analysis, doi
  68. (2004). Hydrodynamics and water quality modelling in a regulated river segment: application on the instream flow definition." doi
  69. (2003). Hydrological impacts of floodplain restoration: a case study of the River Cherwell, UK." doi
  70. (1994). Hydrology in Practice." London:
  71. (2008). Impacts of summer 2007 floods on rural communities in England." Cranfield University; Commission for Rural Communities. Accessed
  72. (2006). Integrating 1D and 2D hydrodynamic models for flood simulation." doi
  73. (2000). Integration of high-resolution topographic data with floodplain flow models." doi
  74. (2007). Interactions between sediment delivery, channel change, climate change and flood risk in a temperate upland environment." doi
  75. (1998). Internal and External Validation of a Two-Dimensional Finite Element Code for River Flood Simulations." doi
  76. (2009). Introduction to Probability and Statistics." doi
  77. (2007). Just say NO to equifinality." doi
  78. (2002). Learning to live with rivers - the ICE's report to government." doi
  79. (2001). Learning to live with rivers: Final Report of the Institution of Civil Engineers' Presidential Commission to Review the Technical Aspects of Flood Risk Management in England and Wales." Institution of Civil Engineers. [Online] Accessed
  80. (2008). Making Space for People: Involving Local Knowledge in Flood Risk Research and Management in Ryedale, Yorkshire." [Online] Accessed
  81. (2005). Making Space for Water: Combating flood risk."
  82. (2004). Making Space for Water. Developing a New Government Strategy for Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management in England." Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs,
  83. (2002). Managing Flood Risk in the UK: Towards an Integration of Social and Technical Perspectives." doi
  84. (2007). Managing the rural landscape." In:
  85. (1993). Mathematical Models: Questions of Trustworthiness." doi
  86. (2002). Modelling and Model Building." In: doi
  87. (2002). Modelling Catchment Hydrology." In:
  88. (2003). More floods, less rain? Changing hydrology in a Yorkshire context." In: M. Atherden (Eds.), Global Warming in a Yorkshire Context.
  89. (2008). National River Flow Archive: Seven at Normanby." Centre for Ecology and Hydrology,
  90. (2003). Numerical modelling in physical geography: understanding, explanation and prediction." In:
  91. (1891). On the flow of water in open channels and pipes."
  92. (1959). Open-channel hydraulics." doi
  93. (2003). Opportunity mapping for trees and floods: final report to the Parrett Catchment Project Wet Woodland Group."
  94. (2009). Opportunity Mapping for Woodland to Reduce Flooding in the Yorkshire & Humber Region." Forest Research,
  95. (2009). Optimal management of wetlands: Quantifying trade-offs between flood risks, recreation, and biodiversity conservation." doi
  96. (2010). Outline Specification for the Construction of Large Woody Debris Dams."
  97. (1978). Overland Flow." In:
  98. (2006). Planning Policy Statement 25: Development and Flood Risk."
  99. (2002). Principles of emergency planning and management." Harpenden: Terra Publishing
  100. (2001). Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer." doi
  101. (2000). Rehabilitation of a lowland river: reconciling flood defence with habitat diversity and geomorphological sustainability." doi
  102. (2009). Representation of landscape hydrological connectivity using a topographically driven surface flow index." doi
  103. (1997). River Dynamics and Channel Maintenance." In:
  104. (2007). River engineering responses." In:
  105. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I -- A discussion of principles." doi
  106. (2007). River Processes." In:
  107. (2009). Role of rural land use management in flood and coastal risk management." doi
  108. (2005). Roughness - time for a re-evaluation?"
  109. (1967). Roughness Characteristics of Natural Channels."
  110. (1996). Samples and Cases: Generalisation and Explanation in Geomorphology." In:
  111. (2003). Sampling in geography." In:
  112. (2001). Scoping study for reducing uncertainty in river flood conveyance."
  113. (1995). Sediment-related river maintenance: The role of fluvial geomorphology." doi
  114. (2010). Sensitivity analysis of distributed erosion models: Framework." doi
  115. (2007). Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: a review." doi
  116. (1996). Simplicity out of complexity in environmental modelling: Occam's razor revisited." doi
  117. (2008). Slowing the floods in the UK Pennine Uplands...a case of Waiting for Godot?" Journal of Practical Ecology and Conservation,
  118. (2010). Slowing the flow at Pickering." [Online] Accessed 22/6/10, from
  119. (1966). Statistical Law of Stream Numbers." doi
  120. (2006). Sustainable flood management: oxymoron or new paradigm?" doi
  121. (1984). Testing a physically-based flood forecasting model (TOPMODEL) for three U.K. catchments." doi
  122. (2001). The 'Validation' of Hydrodynamic Models: Some Critical Perspectives." In:
  123. (1999). The application of computational fluid dynamics to natural river channels: three-dimensional versus twodimensional approaches." doi
  124. (2003). The Critical Role of 'Qualitative Thought' in Physical Geography and Geomorphological Research." In:
  125. (1992). The future of distributed models: calibration and uncertainty prediction." doi
  126. (2008). The Pitt Review: Learning Lessons from the
  127. (1991). The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modelling using digital terrain models." doi
  128. (1973). The role of sensitivity analysis in hydrologic modeling." doi
  129. (2009). The spatial and temporal patterns of aggradation in a temperate, upland, gravel-bed river." doi
  130. (1991). The Total Least Squares Problem: Computational Aspects and Analysis." Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. doi
  131. (1996). Towards a Philosophy of Geomorphology." In:
  132. (2009). UKCP09 Climate Change Projections."
  133. (1998). Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data." doi
  134. (1998). Uncertainty in Flood Estimates Associated with Roughness Coefficient." doi
  135. (2000). Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modelling." doi
  136. (2001). Validation of hydraulic models." In:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.