Article thumbnail

An Evaluation of Design-Seoul Street Projects based on Street Characteristic Types

By ?????????

Abstract

?????? ????????? ??????????????? ????????? ???????????? ?????? ????????????????????? ????????? ???????????????, ????????? ???????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ???????????? ?????? ???????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ????????? ??????????????? ??????????????? ?????? ??????????????? ?????? ????????? ??????????????? ????????????, ????????? ??????????????? ???????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ??????. ????????? ????????? ????????????, ??????????????? ?????? ???????????? ??????????????????, ??????????????????, ????????????/???????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????????. ?????? ??????????????? ????????????/????????? ???????????? ??????1(???????????????+??????????????????)??? ????????????/??????, ??????????????? ?????????, ??????2(???????????????+????????????)??? ????????????/??????, ??????/?????? ?????????, ??????3(???????????????+????????????)??? ???????????????, ????????????/?????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ???????????????. ????????? ?????????, ????????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ???????????? ???????????? ????????????????????? ????????? ????????????, ??????????????? ??????????????? ??????, ?????? ??????????????? ???????????? ????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ??????????????? ??????????????? ????????? ???????????? ???????????????.The goal of this research is to propose outlines of an Evaluation System for Design-Seoul Street Projects, which would improve the previously uniformed street guidelines, by 1) classifying types of streets according to the characteristics of street configurations, and 2) drawing priorities of evaluation criteria. The research findings are as follows: 1) ‘Project Implementation System’, ‘Spatial Planning’, and ‘Locality/Citizen Uses’ appear to be the evaluation subjects in all street types; 2) As for evaluation criteria, acknowledging Coordination/Citizen Participation, Street Type 1 recognizes ‘Locality-Project Feasibility’ in residential-commercial area; Street Type 2 recognizes ‘Identity- Plan/Implementation’ in cultural-commercial area; and Street Type 3 recognizes ‘Project Feasibility-Locality’ in businesses, which are the differentiated aspects of evaluation indicator by types of streets. These imply that Design-Seoul Street Projects should focus on 1) integral plans, considering urban-cultural policies; 2) localized strategies through citizen participation; and 3) organizational cooperations for better communication and caring; and 4) creation of economic values for the local revitalization, which cover beyond the physical design approaches to the built structures in Design-Seoul Street Project

Topics: ?????????????????????, ??????????????????, ????????????, ?????????????????????(CART), ????????????????????????????????????(ANP), Design Seoul Street, Type of Street Characteristics, Evaluation System, Categorical Analysis and Regression Tree (CART), Analytic Network Process(ANP)
Publisher: ???????????????????????? / Urban Design Institute of Korea
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:repository.hanyang.ac.kr:20.500.11754/36520
Provided by: HANYANG Repository
Journal:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.