?????? ????????? ??????????????? ????????? ???????????? ?????? ????????????????????? ????????? ???????????????, ????????? ???????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ???????????? ?????? ???????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ????????? ??????????????? ??????????????? ?????? ??????????????? ?????? ????????? ??????????????? ????????????, ????????? ??????????????? ???????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ??????. ????????? ????????? ????????????, ??????????????? ?????? ???????????? ??????????????????, ??????????????????, ????????????/???????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????????. ?????? ??????????????? ????????????/????????? ???????????? ??????1(???????????????+??????????????????)??? ????????????/??????, ??????????????? ?????????, ??????2(???????????????+????????????)??? ????????????/??????, ??????/?????? ?????????, ??????3(???????????????+????????????)??? ???????????????, ????????????/?????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ???????????????. ????????? ?????????, ????????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ???????????? ???????????? ????????????????????? ????????? ????????????, ??????????????? ??????????????? ??????, ?????? ??????????????? ???????????? ????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ??????????????? ??????????????? ????????? ???????????? ???????????????.The goal of this research is to propose outlines of an Evaluation System for Design-Seoul Street Projects, which would improve the previously uniformed street guidelines, by 1) classifying types of streets according to the characteristics of street configurations, and 2) drawing priorities of evaluation criteria. The research findings are as follows: 1) ‘Project Implementation System’, ‘Spatial Planning’, and ‘Locality/Citizen Uses’ appear to be the evaluation subjects in all street types; 2) As for evaluation criteria, acknowledging Coordination/Citizen Participation, Street Type 1 recognizes ‘Locality-Project Feasibility’ in residential-commercial area; Street Type 2 recognizes ‘Identity- Plan/Implementation’ in cultural-commercial area; and Street Type 3 recognizes ‘Project Feasibility-Locality’ in businesses, which are the differentiated aspects of evaluation indicator by types of streets. These imply that Design-Seoul Street Projects should focus on 1) integral plans, considering urban-cultural policies; 2) localized strategies through citizen participation; and 3) organizational cooperations for better communication and caring; and 4) creation of economic values for the local revitalization, which cover beyond the physical design approaches to the built structures in Design-Seoul Street Project
To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.