Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Examines differences of ERP components with respect to <i>target stimuli</i>.

By Seul-Ki Yeom (657325), Siamac Fazli (273240), Klaus-Robert Müller (52696) and Seong-Whan Lee (391862)


<p>First row: F-values and significance of the repeated measures one-way ANOVA. Next three rows: Show statistical significance (p-values) of ERP components having different means for the three speller conditions (two-sample t-test with the hypothesis of equal means). Last row: Shows p-values of whether ERP components have different means for the non-self face and self-face stimuli.</p><p>* - ** - *** - </p><p>Examines differences of ERP components with respect to <i>target stimuli</i>.</p

Topics: Uncategorised, erp, BCI, novel P 300, communication, stimuli, approach, rc, presentation, face familiarity, performance, interface, stimulus, paradigm
Year: 2014
DOI identifier: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111157.t003
OAI identifier:
Provided by: FigShare
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.