Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Comparison of the gene annotation by Prodigual, GeneMarkS, and Glimmer3 with the annotated sequences of the reference strain PAO1.

By Benoît Valot (68921), Christophe Guyeux (625819), Julien Yves Rolland (736837), Kamel Mazouzi (736838), Xavier Bertrand (114101) and Didier Hocquet (114103)

Abstract

<p>The values indicate the numbers of predicted genes falling into each category. The percentages indicate the proportion of the 5,542 annotated genes of PAO1 correctly annotated (100% identical).</p><p><sup>a</sup>Predicted gene is 100% identical with a reference gene.</p><p><sup>b</sup>Predicted gene is ≥ 50% identical with a reference gene.</p><p><sup>c</sup>Predicted gene is < 50% identical with a reference gene.</p><p>Comparison of the gene annotation by Prodigual, GeneMarkS, and Glimmer3 with the annotated sequences of the reference strain PAO1.</p

Topics: Uncategorised, gene detection, 17 reference strains, Opportunistic Pathogen Updated Pseudomonas aeruginosa, core genome, virulence genes
Year: 2015
DOI identifier: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126468.t002
OAI identifier: oai:figshare.com:article/1409719
Provided by: FigShare
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • https://figshare.com/articles/... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.