Article thumbnail

Comparison of PAPST Derived Enhancers to the Literature.

By Paul W. Bible (738340), Yuka Kanno (394497), Lai Wei (36699), Stephen R. Brooks (738341), John J. O’Shea (394499), Maria I. Morasso (255438), Rasiah Loganantharaj (738342) and Hong-Wei Sun (115717)

Abstract

<p>Comparison of PAPST identified ESC enhancers with published ESC enhancers [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0127285#pone.0127285.ref016" target="_blank">16</a>] shows that PAPST identified over 95% of those found by Hnisz et al. The enhancers were identified through the calculation of genomic regions co-localized by Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog.</p

Topics: Biological Sciences, Peak Assignment, domain work, PAPST, genomic regions, enhancer analysis, command line tools, installation procedures, customization features, em, Powerful Java Platform, transcription factors, online tools, customizable tool, usability issues, Response times, User Friendly, purpose features, genomic research, Linux expertise, tf, case study, command line, genomic data analysis
Year: 2015
DOI identifier: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127285.g002
OAI identifier: oai:figshare.com:article/1413464
Provided by: FigShare
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • https://figshare.com/articles/... (external link)
  • http://www.plosone.org/article... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.