Location of Repository

The changing roles of personnel managers: old ambiguities, new uncertainties

By Raymond Caldwell

Abstract

There have been notable attempts to capture the changing nature of personnel roles in response to major transformations in the workplace and the associated rise of ‘HRM’. A decade ago Storey (1992) explored the emerging impact of workplace change on personnel practice in the UK and proposed a new fourfold typology of personnel roles: ‘advisors’, ‘handmaidens’, ‘regulators’ and ‘changemakers’. Have these four roles changed now that HRM has increasingly become part of the rhetoric and reality of organizational performance? If Storey's work provides an empirical and analytical benchmark for examining issues of ‘role change’, then Ulrich's (1997) work in the USA offers a sweeping prescriptive end-point for the transformation of personnel roles that has already been widely endorsed by UK practitioners. He argues that HR professionals must overcome the traditional marginality of the personnel function by embracing a new set of roles as champions of competitiveness in delivering value. Is this a realistic ambition? The new survey findings and interview evidence from HR managers in major UK companies presented here suggests that the role of the personnel professional has altered in a number of significant respects, and has become more multifaceted and complex, but the negative counter-images of the past still remain. To partly capture the process of role change, Storey's original fourfold typology of personnel roles is re-examined and contrasted with Ulrich's prescriptive vision for the reinvention on the HR function. It is concluded that Storey's typology has lost much of its empirical and analytical veracity, while Ulrich's model ends in prescriptive overreach by submerging issues of role conflict within a new rhetoric of professional identity. Neither model can adequately accommodate the emergent tensions between competing role demands, ever-increasing managerial expectations of performance and new challenges to professional expertise, all of which are likely to intensify in the future

Topics: manop
Publisher: Wiley
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.bbk.ac.uk.oai2:52

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1997). A chameleon function: HRM in the 1990s’. doi
  2. (1996). A Handbook of Personnel Practice.
  3. (1985). A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and conflict in work settings’. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, doi
  4. (1998). A new mandate for human resources’.
  5. (1998). A new mandate for human resources’. Harvard Business Review, 76,J a n uary–
  6. (2001). Champions, adapters, consultants and synergists: the new change agents in HRM’. doi
  7. (2003). Changing Roles of Personnel Managers 1003 © doi
  8. (1992). Developments in the Management of Human Resources. doi
  9. (1986). Evaluating the Personnel Function.
  10. (1997). From Admin to Strategy: The Changing Face of the HR Function. Institute of Employment Studies
  11. (1994). Getting in gear: post-recession HRM planning’.
  12. (1997). Handmaid’s tale or midwives of change?’. doi
  13. (1994). How dominant are the professions?’
  14. (1995). HRM: rhetoric, reality and hidden agendas’. In
  15. (1997). Human Resource Champions. doi
  16. (1987). Human resource management and industrial relations’. doi
  17. (1989). Human resource management and the personnel function’. In doi
  18. (1995). Human Resource Management: A Critical Text. doi
  19. (1995). Human Resource Strategy: Towards a General Theory of HRM.
  20. (1993). Issues of power and marginality in personnel’. doi
  21. (1998). Of believers, atheists and agnostics: practitioner views on HRM’. doi
  22. (1993). Personnel leadership in technical and human resource change’. In
  23. (1994). Personnel management in Britain: paradigms, practices and prospects’. In Sisson,
  24. (1978). Power, Innovation and Problem Solving in Personnel Management.
  25. (1990). Role change’. doi
  26. (1995). Role conflict, ambiguity and overload: a 21 nation study’. doi
  27. (1986). The Changing Nature of Personnel Management. doi
  28. (1997). The Changing Role of the Human Resource Function – Consortium Project. London: Cabinet Office.
  29. (1977). The Personnel Managers. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 1004 R. Caldwell © doi
  30. (1993). The role of personnel specialists: centrality or marginality?’. In
  31. (1967). The role set’. In
  32. (1988). The System of Professions. Chicago: doi
  33. (1999). Workforce Employee Relations Survey – First Findings. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.