Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Norms, interests and institutional change

By Dionyssis G. Dimitrakopoulos

Abstract

This paper provides a norms-based account of institutional change. It compares two cases of attempted change, one successful and one unsuccessful. The argument advanced is that norm-based change occurs when the norms are congruent with the perceived interests of the actors who have the power to take on the decision. Norms affect the process of institutional change not only by providing legitimacy to some forms of political action, but also by shaping the actors’ perception of their interests as well their strategies. It is argued that norms, in that sense, help political actors combine Max Weber's zweckrational (goal-orientated) and wertrational (value-orientated) categories of behaviour. Empirical evidence drawn from the context of the evolving European Union supports this argument

Topics: polsoc
Publisher: Political Studies Association
Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.bbk.ac.uk.oai2:127
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/127/1... (external link)
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.14... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (1998). The Social Democratic Moment. doi
    2. (2001). Laeken – Prime Minister’s statement to Parliament,
    3. (2001). The Transformation of the Swedish Model: Economic Ideas, doi
    4. (1997). St Clair doi
    5. (1987). laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the
    6. (1999). the EU doi
    7. (1994). A Democratic Dilemma: System Effectiveness versus Citizen Participation’, doi
    8. (1998). On Democracy. New Haven: Yale doi
    9. (1998). Proposal for a Council Decision laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission,
    10. (2001). Presidency Conclusions doi
    11. (1968). Résolution relative aux procedures communautaires d’exécution du droit communautaire derive. JOCE,
    12. (1998). Resolution on the modification of the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission. B4-0801/98. Plenary session minutes,
    13. (1985). Bringing the State Back In. doi
    14. (2000). Vom Staatenverbund zur Föderation - Gedanken über die Finalität der europäischen Integration. Speech delivered at Humboldt-Universität,
    15. (2002). Discours Introductif à la Convention sur l’Avenir de l’Europe,
    16. (1993). Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework’ doi
    17. (1986). Governing the Economy. doi
    18. (1989). The Political Power of Economic Ideas. doi
    19. (2003). Composite Democracy in Europe: the Role of Transparency and Access to Information’, doi
    20. (2000). Parliamentary Oversight of Executive Power: What Role for the European Parliament in Comitology’
    21. (2002). Constitutional Agenda-Setting through Discretion in Rule Interpretation: Why the European Parliament won at Amsterdam’, doi
    22. (2001). Intervention sur l’Avenir de l’Europe Elargie,
    23. (1993). Coping with Terrorism: Norms and Internal Security in Germany and Japan’
    24. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry. doi
    25. (1989). Rules, Norms and Decisions. doi
    26. (1990). A Logic of Institutional Change’
    27. (1994). Transparency and Democratic Legitimacy’, doi
    28. (1984). The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life’, doi
    29. (1995). Democratic Governance. doi
    30. (1998). The Currency of Ideas. doi
    31. (2003). Britain and the Convention on the doi
    32. (1995). Les Politiques Publiques Comme Construction d’un Rapport au Monde’
    33. (1996). The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis’, doi
    34. (2000). Not Just What, but When: Timing and Sequence doi
    35. (1992). Structuring Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. doi
    36. (1984). Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. doi
    37. (2000). Government by Committee: Three Principles of Evaluation’
    38. (1987). Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation’, doi
    39. (1998). On Democracy. doi
    40. (2005). Norms, Interests and Institutional Change’, forthcoming, doi
    41. (1921). [1972]) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. 5 th edn.

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.