Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The CHD challenge: comparing four cost-effectivness models

By David Turner, James Raftery, Keith Cooper, Eleanor Fairbank, Stephen Palmer, Sue Ward and Roberta Ara

Abstract

Objectives: to compare four UK models evaluating the cost-effectiveness of interventions in coronary heart disease (CHD), exploring the relative importance of structure and inputs in accounting for differences, and the scope for consensus on structure and data.<br/><br/>Methods: we compared published cost-effectiveness results (incremental cost, quality-adjusted life year, and cost-effectiveness ratio) of three models conforming to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines dealing with three interventions (statins, percutaneous coronary intervention, and clopidogrel) with a model developed in Southampton. Comparisons were made using three separate stages: 1) comparison of published results; 2) comparison of the results using the same data inputs wherever possible; and 3) an in-depth exploration of reasons for differences and the potential for consensus.<br/><br/>Results: although published results differed by up to 73% (for statins), standardization of inputs (stage 2) narrowed these gaps. Greater understanding of the reasons for differences was achieved, but a consensus on preferred values for all data inputs was not reached.<br/><br/>Conclusions: we found that published guidance on methods was important to reduce variation in important model inputs. Although the comparison of models did not lead to consensus for all model inputs, it provided a better understanding of the reasons for these differences, and enhanced the transparency and credibility of all models. Similar comparisons would be aided by fuller publication of models, perhaps through detailed web appendice

Topics: HJ, R1
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:181291
Provided by: e-Prints Soton
Sorry, our data provider has not provided any external links therefore we are unable to provide a link to the full text.

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.