Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The impact of contract duration on the cost of cash retention

By Will Hughes, Patricia Hillebrandt and John Murdoch


Cash retention is a common means of protecting an employer from a contractor's insolvency as well as ensuring that contractors finish the work that they start. Similarly, contractors withhold part of payments due to their sub-contractors. Larger contracts tend to be subjected to smaller rates of retention. By calculating the cost of retention as an amount per year of a contract, it is shown that retention is far more expensive for firms whose work consists of short contracts. The extra cost is multiplied when the final payment is delayed, as it often is for those whose work takes place at the beginning of a project. This may explain why it is that main contractors are a lot less interested than sub-contractors in alternatives to cash retention, such as retention bond

Topics: 506, 692, 332, 658
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Year: 2000
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1994). Constructing the team: final report of the government/industry review of procurement and contractual arrangements in the UK construction industry.
  2. (1996). Construction contracts: law and management. doi
  3. (1998). Financial protection in the UK building industry: bonds, retentions and guarantees.
  4. (1997). Giving up retentions.
  5. (1997). M&E giants ban retentions.
  6. (1997). Minister urges specialists to back use of retention bonds.
  7. (1991). Payment of sub-contractors when main contractor is insolvent.
  8. (1997). Questions for cash.
  9. (1997). Specialist trade contracting: report.
  10. (1998). Standard form of building contract
  11. (1992). Surviving main contractor insolvency: a practical guide. Aldershot: Confederation of Construction Specialists.
  12. (1992). The status of retention funds in insolvency.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.