Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex are inversely coupled during regulation of negative affect and predict the diurnal pattern of cortisol secretion among older adults

By Heather L. Urry, Carina Marije Van Reekum, Tom Johnstone, Ned H. Kalin, Marchell E. Thurow, Hillary S. Schaefer, Cory A. Jackson, Corrina J. Frye, Lawrence L. Greischar, Andrew L. Alexander and Richard J. Davidson

Abstract

Among younger adults, the ability to willfully regulate negative affect, enabling effective responses to stressful experiences, engages regions of prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the amygdala. Because regions of PFC and the amygdala are known to influence the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, here we test whether PFC and amygdala responses during emotion regulation predict the diurnal pattern of salivary cortisol secretion. We also test whether PFC and amygdala regions are engaged during emotion regulation in older (62- to 64-year-old) rather than younger individuals. We measured brain activity using functional magnetic resonance imaging as participants regulated (increased or decreased) their affective responses or attended to negative picture stimuli. We also collected saliva samples for 1 week at home for cortisol assay. Consistent with previous work in younger samples, increasing negative affect resulted in ventral lateral, dorsolateral, and dorsomedial regions of PFC and amygdala activation. In contrast to previous work, decreasing negative affect did not produce the predicted robust pattern of higher PFC and lower amygdala activation. Individuals demonstrating the predicted effect (decrease <span class='textles'>s</span> attend in the amygdala), however, exhibited higher signal in ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) for the same contrast. Furthermore, participants displaying higher VMPFC and lower amygdala signal when decreasing compared with the attention control condition evidenced steeper, more normative declines in cortisol over the course of the day. Individual differences yielded the predicted link between brain function while reducing negative affect in the laboratory and diurnal regulation of endocrine activity in the home environment

Publisher: The Society for Neuroscience
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:centaur.reading.ac.uk:4379

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). Alterations in cortisol negative feedback inhibition as examined using the ACTH response to cortisol administration in PTSD. doi
  2. (2005). Anxiety reduction through detachment: subjective, physiological, and neural effects.
  3. (1993). Armario A
  4. (2006). Association of neural and physiological responses during voluntary emotion suppression.
  5. (2005). Depression and cortisol 4424
  6. (2002). Differential functioning of the Beck depression inventory in late-life patients: use of item response theory. Psychol Aging 17:379–391.
  7. (2004). Extinction learning in humans: role of the amygdala and vmPFC.
  8. FitzgeraldDA,Nathan PJ,MooreGJ, Uhde TW,TancerME (2005) Neural substrates for voluntary suppression of negative affect: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiatry 57:210–219.
  9. (2004). Flattened cortisol rhythms in metastatic breast cancer patients.
  10. (2003). Geriatric performance on theNeurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (Cognistat).What is normal? Arch Clin Neuropsychol 18:463–471.
  11. (1999). Gratton A
  12. (2003). Inverse amygdala andmedial prefrontal cortex responses to surprised faces.
  13. (2004). Making a life worth living: neural correlates of well-being.
  14. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory.
  15. (1995). Measurement of stress hormones. In: Measuring stress: a guide for health and social scientists
  16. (2004). Neural basis of emotional self-regulation in childhood.
  17. (2003). Neural circuitry underlying voluntary suppression of sadness.
  18. (2001). Neural correlates of conscious self-regulation of emotion.
  19. (2006). Neural correlates of regulating negative emotions related to moral violations.
  20. (2002). Neurons in medial prefrontal cortex signal memory for fear extinction.
  21. (2003). Now you feel it, now you don’t: frontal brain electrical asymmetry and individual differences in emotion regulation.
  22. (2002). Rethinking feelings: an fMRI study of the cognitive regulation of emotion.
  23. RobertsonER,Chopra S,Gabrieli JD,Gross JJ (2004) For better or for worse: neural systems supporting the cognitive down- and up-regulation of negative emotion.
  24. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 36:717–731.
  25. (2005). State and trait affect as predictors of salivary cortisol in healthy adults.
  26. (1999). Stress and hippocampal plasticity.
  27. (2000). Suppression and enhancement of emotional responses to unpleasant pictures.
  28. (1995). The effect of chronic stress on plasma cortisol concentrations in cyclic female pigs depends on the time of day. Domest Anim Endocrinol 12:167–177.
  29. (2005). The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function. In: Measuring the mind: speed, control, and age
  30. (1993). The role of the medial prefrontal cortex (cingulate gyrus) in the regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenal responses to stress.
  31. (2005). The Spielberger StateTrait Anxiety Inventory (STAI): the state scale in detecting mental disorders in geriatric patients.
  32. (1999). the Study of Emotion and Attention
  33. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.
  34. (2006). Voluntary Regulation of Negative Affect doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.