Location of Repository

Gentlemen, stop your engines!

By Guy McCrossan Haworth


For fifty years, computer chess has pursued an original goal of Artificial Intelligence, to produce a chess-engine to compete at the highest level. The goal has arguably been achieved, but that success has made it harder to answer questions about the relative playing strengths of\ud man and machine. The proposal here is to approach such questions in a counter-intuitive way, handicapping or stopping-down chess engines so that they play less well. The intrinsic lack of man-machine games may be side-stepped by analysing existing games to place computer engines\ud as accurately as possible on the FIDE ELO scale of human play. Move-sequences may also be assessed for likelihood if computer-assisted cheating is suspected

Publisher: The International Computer Games Association
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:centaur.reading.ac.uk:4519

Suggested articles



  1. (2001). Cheating in Chess.
  2. (2005). Chess Endgame News.
  3. (2005). Chess endgames: 6-man data and strategy.
  4. (2003). Chess Endgames: Data and Strategy. doi
  5. (2006). Computer Analysis of World Chess Champions.
  6. (2005). Deeper model endgame analysis.
  7. (2007). How Trustworthy is Crafty’s Analysis of Chess Champions? Computer Games Workshop
  8. (2007). http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~regan/chess/fidelity/ Measuring Fidelity to a Computer Agent.
  9. (1992). KQKR: Assessing the Utility of Heuristics.
  10. (1992). KQKR: Awareness of a Fallible Opponent.
  11. (1993). KQKR: Speculatively Thwarting a Human Opponent.
  12. (2003). Model Endgame Analysis.
  13. (2002). Reference Fallible Endgame Play.
  14. (1999). The Nature of Minimax Search.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.