Location of Repository

Technocracy inside the rule of law : challenges in the foundations of legal norms

By Juan Ramón Fallada García-Valle

Abstract

Technocracy is usually opposed to democracy. Here, another perspective is taken: technocracy is countered with the rule of law. In trying to understand the contemporary dynamics of the rule of law, two main types of legal systems (in a broad sense) have to be distinguished: firstly, the legal norm, studied by the science of law; secondly, the scientific laws (which includes the legalities of the different sciences and communities). They both contain normative prescriptions. But their differ in their subjects‘ source: while legal norms are the will’s expression of the normative authority, technical prescriptions can be derived from scientific laws, which are grounded over the commonly supposed objectivity of the scientific knowledge about reality. They both impose sanctions too, but in the legal norm they refer to what is established by the norm itself, while in the scientific legality they consist in the reward or the punishment derived from the efficacy or inefficacy to reach the end pursued by the action. The way of legitimation also differs: while legal norms have to have followed the formal procedures and must not have contravened any fundamental right, technical norms‘ validity depend on its theoretical foundations or on its efficacy. Nowadays, scientific knowledge has become and important feature in policy-making. Contradictions can arise between these legal systems. These conflicts are specially grave when the recognition or exercise of fundamental rights is instrumentally used, or when they are violated in order to increase the policies‘ efficacy. A political system is technocratic, when, in case of contradiction, the scientific law finally prevails

Topics: ddc:340
Year: 2012
OAI identifier: oai:publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de:24934

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1993). Algunos modelos metodológicos de ‘ciencia’ jurídica.
  2. (1991). Análisis lógico y derecho.
  3. (2001). and politics. Political triumph and ethical erosion.
  4. (2010). Between positivism and non-positivism? A third reply to Eugenio Bulygin», 1st conference on Philosophy and Law: Neutrality and theory of law.
  5. (1968). Ciencia y técnica como “ideología”. 5th ed.,
  6. (1991). Constitucionalismo y derechos fundamentales.
  7. (1990). Contribución a la teoría del derecho.
  8. (2005). Democratization of expertise? Exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision-making,
  9. (1993). Derecho y razón práctica.
  10. (1922). Economía y sociedad. 2nd ed.,
  11. (1993). El concepto de validez y el conflicto entre el positivismo jurídico y el derecho natural», en El concepto de validez y otros ensayos, 2nd ed.,
  12. (2002). Estado de derecho y legitimidad democrática»,
  13. (1974). Estado y utopía.
  14. government and the politics of knowledge», en
  15. (1986). Hechos, normas, proposiciones. Ensayos y conferencias.
  16. (2003). Historiography of science: an American perspective»,
  17. (1986). Introducción a la ciencia jurídica.
  18. (2003). L'era de la informació. «Vol. I: La societat xarxa».
  19. (2008). La apropiación política de la ciencia: origen y evolución de una nueva tecnocracia». Ciencia, tecnología y sociedad, v. 4, nº 10, enero
  20. (1979). La condición postmoderna.
  21. (2003). La revolución tecnocientífica.
  22. (2006). La sociedad del riesgo,
  23. (1996). Natural law and positive law»,
  24. (1970). Norma y acción.
  25. (1991). Policy development and big science»,
  26. (2001). politics and governance», in De la Mothe,
  27. (2001). Politics and the communities of science»,
  28. (1995). Science at the bar: law, science, and technology in America. Cambridge,
  29. (2002). Sistemas jurídicos y conflictos normativos.
  30. (1980). Tatsachen, Normen, Sätze. Asfsätze und Vorträge. Stturgart, Philipp Reclam,
  31. (1990). Technocracy and the politics of expertise.
  32. (1960). Teoría pura del derecho. 16th ed.,
  33. (2005). The changing nature of public science», en Nowotny, H; Pestre, D; SchmidtAssmann, E; schulze-Fielitz, H; Trute, H-H, The public nature of science under assault. Politics, markets, science and the law.
  34. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society.
  35. (2010). The dual nature of law»,
  36. (2008). The nature and basis of human dignity»,
  37. (1968). The structure of scientific revolutions.
  38. (2005). The technosciences between markests, social worries and the political: how to imagine a better future?», in
  39. (1976). What is this thing called science? 3rd ed.,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.