Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Identification of critical time‐consuming student support activities in e‐learning

By Rob Koper, Kees Pannekeet, Peter van Rosmalen, Peter Sloep, Liesbeth Kester and Fred de Vries


Higher education staff involved in e‐learning often struggle with organising their student support activities. To a large extent this is due to the high workload involved with such activities. We distinguish support related to learning content, learning processes and student products. At two different educational institutions, surveys were conducted to identify the most critical support activities, using the Nominal Group Method. The results are discussed and brought to bear on the distinction between content‐related, process‐related and product‐related support activities

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2005
DOI identifier: 10.1080/09687760500376488
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2005). (Eds.) Beyond the comfort zone:
  2. (2000). Assessing programmatic needs, in: D. Liddell (Ed.) Powerful programming for student learning: approaches that make a difference (New Directions for Student Services, no. 90) doi
  3. (1999). Assessing the costs and benefits of telelearning: a case study from the University of British Columbia, Network of Centres of Excellence (NCE)—Telelearning Project report. Available online at: (accessed 31
  4. (2002). Becoming a virtual professor: pedagogical roles and asynchronous learning networks, doi
  5. (2002). Begeleiden bij competentiegericht leren in een electronische leeromgeving aan de Open Universiteit Nederland.
  6. (2004). But that didn’t happen last semester: explanations of the mediated environmental factors that affect online tutor capabilities, in: R.
  7. (2003). Can e-learning promote higher-order learning without tutor overload?, doi
  8. (2000). Costing the lifecycle of networked learning: documenting the costs from conception to evaluation, doi
  9. (2005). Distance education’ and ‘e-learning’: not the same thing,
  10. (2004). E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online (2nd edn) (London, doi
  11. (2005). Factors associated with student plagiarism in a post-1992 university, Assessment and Evaluation doi
  12. (2005). Factors associated with student plagiarism in a post-1992 university, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 137–162.Identification of support activities in e-learning 229 doi
  13. (1998). Nominal Group Technique*: a users’ guide. Available online at: (accessed 31
  14. (2004). Roles and competencies of the e-tutor,
  15. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions doi
  16. (2004). Teaching in an online learning context, in: T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.) Theory and practice of online learning (Athabasca, Athabasca University), 271–294. Available online at: (accessed 1
  17. (2001). The costs and costing of networked learning,
  18. (1990). The instructor’s changing role in distance education, doi
  19. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, doi
  20. (2004). Use of the semantic web to solve some basic problems in education: increase flexible, distributed lifelong learning, decrease teacher’s workload,
  21. (1999). Visualizing learning activities to support tutors, CHI ’99 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.