Location of Repository

The development of accessibility indicators for distance learning programs

By Sheryl Burgstahler

Abstract

A study was undertaken to explore program policies and practices related to the accessibility of American distance learning courses to qualified students with disabilities. A literature review was conducted, a draft list of accessibility indicators was created, examples of applications of the indicators in existing distance learning programs were collected, the indicators were systematically applied to one distance learning program, input from a variety of distance learning programs was used to further refine the indicators, and these programs were encouraged to adopt the indicators and make use of resources provided by the project. Results of this exploratory work suggest that incorporating accessibility considerations into policies, procedures and communications of a program requires consideration of the unique needs of students, course designers, instructors and evaluators; involves approval and implementation at a variety of administrative levels; and is an ongoing process that may be implemented in incremental steps

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2006
DOI identifier: 10.1080/09687760500479753
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:101/core5

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1990). 42 U.S.C.A. § 12101 et seq. Available online at: http:/ /www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/statute.html (accessed 6
  2. (1998). A curriculum every student can use: Design principles for student access,
  3. (2004). A review of 2000–2003 literature at the intersection of online learning and disability, doi
  4. (2000). Access to Internet-based instruction for people with disabilities, in: doi
  5. (2004). AccessDL
  6. (2005). Accessibility in distance education: a resource for faculty in online teaching
  7. (2002). Accessibility standards for web resources v1.3
  8. (2006). Accessibility statement (2005) Arizona State University. Available online at: http://asuonline.asu.edu/accessibility.cfm (accessed 6
  9. (1990). Americans with Disabilities Act of doi
  10. (1995). An organizational learning perspective on school responses to central policy initiatives, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco (Eric Document Reproduction Service No.
  11. (2000). Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board doi
  12. (2006). Available online at: http://cio.uiowa.edu/Policy/WebAccessibility.htm (accessed 6
  13. (2002). Available online at: http://standards.mivu.org/ National Council on Disability
  14. (2006). Available online at: http://www.cec.sped.org/osep/udesign.html (accessed 6
  15. (2006). Available online at: http://www.csusm.edu/accessibility/onlinecourses/(accessed 6
  16. (1998). Burgstahler US Department of Education
  17. (1998). Changing organizations: practicing action training and research (Thousand Oaks, CA,
  18. (2005). Clarifying distance education roles and competencies: exploring similarities and differences between professional and student-practitioner perspectives, doi
  19. Closing the Gap (2005) Resource directory,
  20. (1999). Colleges Chancellor’s Office
  21. (1996). Correspondence to Senator Tom Harkin, 9 September. Available online at: http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/foia/cltr204.txt (accessed 6
  22. (2003). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2000–2001,
  23. (2006). Distance learning (2004) Santa Fe Community College,
  24. (2002). Distance learning: universal design, universal access, doi
  25. (2006). DO-IT (undated a) Resources for student services staff
  26. (1999). Going the distance, doi
  27. (2006). Guiding principles for faculty in distance learning (2005) The University of Wisconsin Madison. Available online at: http://www.ihets.org/progserv/education/distance/guiding_principles/ #intro (accessed 6
  28. (2000). Information technology and people with disabilities: the current state of federal accessibility. Available online at: http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/508/report/content.htm (accessed 6
  29. (1998). Infusing multicultural education: a process of creating organizational change at the college level,
  30. (2005). Instructional theories supporting universal design for learning— teaching to individual learners, in: Council for Exceptional Children (Ed.) Universal design for learning: a guide for teachers and education professionals (Upper Saddle River,
  31. (2004). Making distance learning courses accessible to students and instructors with disabilities: a case study, doi
  32. (2000). Meeting the evolving education needs of faculty in providing access for college students with learning disabilities, doi
  33. (2002). Online course accessibility: a call for responsibility and necessity,
  34. (2001). Online distance education—‘anytime, anywhere’ but not for everyone,
  35. (2005). Online instructor handbook
  36. (2005). Online student handbook: additional resources
  37. (2005). Online student handbook: getting started doi
  38. (2004). Providing access to students with disabilities in online distance education: legal and technical concerns for higher education, doi
  39. (2000). Quality on the line: benchmarks for success in Internetbased distance education (Washington,
  40. (2006). Student guidebook: policies and procedures for distanced education classes (undated)
  41. (2006). Student guidebook: policies and procedures for distanced education classes (undated) University of South Carolina, Spartanburg, SC. Available online at: http://www.uscupstate.edu/academics/ distance/guidebook_students.pdf (accessed 6
  42. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: universal design for learning (Alexandria, VA, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development). doi
  43. (1997). Teaching on the net: what’s the difference?,
  44. (2004). The University of Wisconsin Madison. Available online at: http:// www.doit.wisc.edu/accessibility/index.asp (accessed 6
  45. (2003). Thirty-two trends affecting distance education: an informed foundation for strategic planning,
  46. (1992). Universal design
  47. (2005). Universal design of instruction (Seattle,
  48. (1998). Universal instructional design in higher education: an approach for inclusion, Equity and Excellence doi
  49. (2006). Virtual classroom (2005) Mt. San Antonio College,
  50. (1973). Vocational Rehabilitation Act doi
  51. (1998). Vocational Rehabilitation Amendments doi
  52. (1999). Web Consortium doi
  53. (2003). Web Consortium (2003) Web content accessibility guidelines 2.0: W3C working draft 24 doi
  54. (1997). What is universal design?, College of Design. Center for Universal Design. Available online at: http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/univ_design/ud.htm (accessed 6
  55. (2006). Wisconsin-Madison continuing education and outreach (2005) The University of Wisconsin-Madison. Available online at: http://www.wisc.edu/outreach/conted.htm (accessed 6

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.