Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Using multimedia to enhance the accessibility of the learning environment for disabled students: reflections from the Skills for Access project

By David Sloan, John Stratford and Peter Gregor

Abstract

As educators' awareness of their responsibilities towards ensuring the accessibility of the learning environment to disabled students increases, significant debate surrounds the implications of accessibility requirements on educational multimedia. There would appear to be widespread concern that the fundamental principles of creating accessible web‐based materials seem at odds with the creative and innovative use of multimedia to support learning and teaching, as well as concerns over the time and cost of providing accessibility features that can hold back resource development and application. Yet, effective use of multimedia offers a way of enhancing the accessibility of the learning environment for many groups of disabled students. Using the development of ‘Skills for Access’, a web resource supporting the dual aims of creating optimally accessible multimedia for learning, as an example, the attitudinal, practical and technical challenges facing the effective use of multimedia as an accessibility aid in a learning environment will be explored. Reasons why a holistic approach to accessibility may be the most effective in ensuring that multimedia reaches its full potential in enabling and supporting students in learning, regardless of any disability they may have, will be outlined and discussed

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2006
DOI identifier: 10.1080/09687760500479936
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:107/core5

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2002). Accessibility and Macromedia Flash, in: Constructing accessible web sites (Berkeley, Glasshaus/Apress), doi
  2. (2002). Accessibility Initiative doi
  3. (2002). Accessibility study of BBCi: problems faced by users with disabilities, BBC and System Concepts. Available online at: http:// www.bbc.co.uk/commissioning/newmedia/pdf/BBCi_Accessibility_Study_7-10-02.pdf (accessed 28
  4. (2005). Accessibility: the current situations and new directions,
  5. (2005). Are guidelines enough? An introduction to designing websites for older people, doi
  6. (2004). Best practices in online captioning. Available online at: http://joeclark.org/access/ captioning/bpoc/?axx (accessed 28
  7. (2002). Building accessible websites (Indianapolis,
  8. (2002). Building standards-conformant accessible learning objects with Flash MX, Macromedia White Paper. Available online at: http://download.macromedia.com/pub/ solutions/downloads/accessibility/fl_learning_obj.pdf (accessed 21
  9. (2002). Click and go: video streaming—a guide for educational development. Available online at: http://www2.umist.ac.uk/isd/lwt/clickgo/the_guide/ Video_Streaming-The_Guide128bit.pdf (accessed 29
  10. (2004). Content service providers and the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, a briefing paper for JISC Legal Information Service. Available online at: http://www.jisclegal.ac.uk/ publications/legalimplicationsDDA.htm (accessed 28
  11. (2004). Countering design exclusion—an introduction to inclusive design (London, doi
  12. (2003). Designing with web standards (Indianapolis, doi
  13. (2004). Developing a holistic approach for e-learning accessibility,
  14. (2003). Developing and reusing accessible content and applications, in: A. Littlejohn (Ed.) Reusing online resources—a sustainable approach to e-learning (London,
  15. (2005). Digital interactive television in the UK: is the opportunity for ‘inclusivity’ being missed?, paper presented at the
  16. (1995). Disability Discrimination Act doi
  17. (2002). Disability Discrimination Act 1995—Part IV code of practice for providers of post 16 education and related services. Available online at: http://www.drcgb.org/uploaded_files/documents/4008_187_post-16%20Part%201.pdf (accessed 14
  18. (2005). Forcing standardization or accommodating diversity? A framework for applying the WCAG in the real world, in: doi
  19. (2000). Fundamental principles and priority setting for universal usability, in: doi
  20. (2002). Inclusion of cognitive disabilities in the web accessibility movement, in:
  21. (2002). Learning Consortium
  22. (2003). Making chalk and talk accessible, in: doi
  23. (2002). Maximum accessibility
  24. (2005). Ofcom (undated) Television access services. Available online at:
  25. (2003). Reusing online resources—a sustainable approach to e-learning (London,
  26. (2003). Skills for access: promoting accessible, engaging multimedia in e-learning, ASSIGNation,
  27. (1999). Style guide for the design of interactive television services for elderly viewers (Winchester, Independent Television Commission). Available online at: http://www.computing.dundee.ac.uk/staff/acarmichael/Carmichael_DesignStyleGuide.pdf (accessed 21
  28. (2005). Synchronised Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL) 2.0, World Wide Web Consortium. Available online at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-SMIL2-20050107/ (accessed 28
  29. (2004). Tension, what tension? Website accessibility and visual design, in: doi
  30. (2005). The case for a European centre for accessible media, paper presented at the NESTA Seminar, 19 February. Available online at: http://www.nesta.org.uk/assets/pdf/casefor-ecam-nesta-seminar.pdf (accessed 28
  31. (2004). The development of accessibility practices in e-learning: an exploration of communities of practice, doi
  32. (2000). The development of language processing support for the ViSiCAST project, in: doi
  33. (2005). WebAIM (undated) Media Player Accessibility. Available online at:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.