Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The use of animated agents in e‐learning environments: an exploratory, interpretive case study

By A. Kamil Mahmood and Elaine Ferneley

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the use of animated agents in e‐learning environments. However, empirical investigations of their use in online education are limited. Our aim is to provide an empirically based framework for the development and evaluation of animated agents in e‐learning environments. Findings suggest a number of challenges, including the multiple dialogue models that animated agents will need to accommodate, the diverse range of roles that pedagogical animated agents can usefully support, the dichotomous relationship that emerges between these roles and that of the lecturer, and student perception of the degree of autonomy that can be afforded to animated agents

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2006
DOI identifier: 10.1080/09687760600668552
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:113/core5

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2004). A framework of synthesizing tutoring conversation capability with web-based distance education courseware, doi
  2. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems, doi
  3. (1994). Agents that reduce work and information overload, doi
  4. (1999). Animated agents for procedural training in virtual reality: perception, cognition and motor control, doi
  5. (2000). Animated pedagogical agents: face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments,
  6. (2003). Case study research design & methods (3rd edn)
  7. (1994). Case study research, design and methods (Thousand Oaks,
  8. (2000). Comparative of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments,
  9. (2002). Conceptualising intelligent agents for teaching and learning,
  10. (1991). Cultures and organizations: software for the mind (London, doi
  11. (2000). Deictic and emotive communication in animated pedagogical agents, in: doi
  12. (2003). Developing a taxonomy of faculty participation in asynchronous learning environments—an exploratory investigation, doi
  13. (2000). Embodied conversational agents doi
  14. (2002). Evaluating the persona effect of an interface agent in an intelligent tutoring system, doi
  15. (2004). From brows to trust: evaluating emboddied conversational agents (Dordrecht, doi
  16. (2004). Game-based learning: how to delight and instruct
  17. (2003). Generalizing generalizability in information systems research, doi
  18. (2006). Gossip agent. Available online at: http://www.tryllian.com/index_Eng.html Walsham,
  19. (2002). Keeping in touch: agents reporting from collaborative virtual environments. Artificial intelligence and interactive entertainment, papers presented at the American Association for Artificial Intelligence Symposium,
  20. (1999). Lifelike pedagogical agents for mixed-initiative problem solving in constructivist learning environments, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, doi
  21. (2006). Microsoft Agent. Available online at: http://www.microsoft.com/msagent/ default.asp
  22. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry doi
  23. (1999). Peripatetic electronic teachers in higher education, doi
  24. (1996). Personality and learning preferences of learners in design-related disciplines,
  25. (1999). Students’ frustrations with a Web-based distance education course’, doi
  26. (2002). The application and evaluation of adaptive hypermedia techniques in Web-based medical education, doi
  27. (1995). The emergence of interpretivism in IS research, doi
  28. (2002). The evolving landscape of learning technology, doi
  29. (2000). The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research, doi
  30. (1999). The no significance difference phenomenon (New Brunswick, IDECC). Available online at: http://teleeducation.nb.ca/nosignificantdifference/ (accessed 20
  31. (1997). The qualitative difference in information systems research and practice, in: doi
  32. (2002). The social life of avatars (London, doi
  33. (2000). Web search behaviour of Internet experts and newbies, doi
  34. (2003). Web-based learning interaction and learning styles, doi
  35. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words?, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.