Location of Repository

Making sense of ‘pure’ phenomenography in information and communication technology in education

By Graham Alsop and Chris Tompsett

Abstract

Research in information and communication technology in education places an increasing emphasis on the use of qualitative analysis (QA). A considerable number of approaches to QA can be adopted, but it is not always clear that researchers recognize either the differences between these approaches or the principles that underlie them. Phenomenography is often identified by researchers as the approach they have used, but little evidence is presented to allow anyone else to assess the objectivity of the results produced. This paper attempts to redress the balance. A small‐scale evaluation was designed and conducted according to ‘pure’ phenomenographic principles and guidelines. This study was then critiqued within the wider context of QA in general. The conclusion is that pure phenomenography has some procedural weaknesses, as well as some methodological limitations regarding the scope of the outcomes. The procedural weaknesses can be resolved by taking account of good practice in QA. The methodological issues are more serious and reduce the value of this approach for research in collaborative learning environments

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2006
DOI identifier: 10.1080/09687760600837058
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:139/core5

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1984). Approaches to Learning,
  2. (1997). Are phenomenographic results reliable?,
  3. (2003). Beyond ‘lesson study’: comparing two ways of facilitating the grasp of some economic concepts,
  4. (1987). Common knowledge: the development of understanding in the classroom
  5. (1977). Conversation, cognition and learning
  6. (1997). Deconstructing deep and surface: towards a critique of phenomenography,
  7. (2002). Grounded theory as an approach to studying students’ use of learning management systems, doi
  8. (1987). Knowledge acquisition for expert systems doi
  9. (1997). Learning and awareness (Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
  10. (1992). Learning from notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation. doi
  11. (1997). Learning in the South Pacific and phenomenography across cultures, doi
  12. (1997). Making sense of ‘pure’ phenomenography in
  13. (1996). Minding action—conceiving of the world versus participating in cultural practices, in: G. Dall’alba & B. Hasselgren (Eds) Reflections on phenomenography—toward a methodology? (Göteborg, Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis).
  14. (1997). On phenomenography, learning and teaching, doi
  15. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I. outcome and process,
  16. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: II. outcome as a function of the learner’s perception of the task,
  17. (2002). Parent conceptions of their role in early childhood education and care public policy and service development, paper presented at the Current Issues in Phenomenography Symposium,
  18. (1993). Phenomenographic research and the measurement of understanding: an investigation, doi
  19. (1997). Phenomenography in higher education, doi
  20. (1986). Phenomenography—a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality,
  21. (1981). Phenomenography—describing conceptions of the world around us, doi
  22. (1994). Postlethwaite (Eds) The international encyclopedia of education (2nd edn)
  23. (2003). Self-respect, dignity and confidence: conceptions of integrity among male patients, doi
  24. (1978). Students’ conceptions of subject matter: an aspect of learning and teaching doi
  25. (1997). Talk as data and practice—a critical look at phenomenographic inquiry and the appeal to experience,
  26. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research (London, Weidenfeld and Nicholson). doi
  27. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research (London, Weidenfeld and Nicholson).Making sense of ‘pure’ phenomenography in
  28. (1989). The reflexivity thesis (Chicago, The
  29. (1998). The university of learning: beyond quality and competence (London, Routledge Falmer).
  30. (1997). Theoretical foundations of phenomenography, doi
  31. (1981). Verbal reports as evidence for the process operator’s knowledge, in: doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.