Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Student reaction to parallel hypertext and menu‐based interfaces

By C.K. Ramaiah, Mubarak Sulaiman and A.J. Meadows

Abstract

It is often necessary to consider the question of what sort of interface is most useful for retrieving information from a particular land of database. A small database of text‐based but multi‐faceted items is used here in order to compare ease and speed of retrieval from two commonly used combinations of interface — HyperCard on an Apple Macintosh and dBase III+ on a PC. For the restricted range of tasks employed here, the latter combination appears to be more acceptable to students with limited computer experience. However, in more general terms, the acceptability of an interface for information retrieval depends on what particular aspect of information retrieval is being emphasized, and what conceptual frameworks students bring to their tasks

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: Universit of Wales Press
Year: 1993
DOI identifier: 10.1080/0968776930010203
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:141/core5

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1991). A taxonomy and rule base for the selection of interaction styles'
  2. (1989). Designing and Implementing User Interfaces for Microcomputer Programs,
  3. (1987). Exploring dBase IH+: The Development of a Database for Use
  4. (1992). How do you run HyperCard projects?',
  5. (1991). HyperCard application for teaching information systems', doi
  6. (1989). HyperCard for the design, development and delivery of instruction', doi
  7. (1988). More firms using HyperCard for training as a front end',
  8. (1989). The potential of HyperCard for psychological research and instruction', doi
  9. (1986). Using geocoded databases in teaching urban historical geography', doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.