Location of Repository

CAL evaluation: Future directions

By Cathy Gunn


Formal, experimental methods have proved increasingly difficult to implement, and lack the capacity to generate detailed results when evaluating the impact of CAL on teaching and learning. The rigid nature of experimental design restricts the scope of investigations and the conditions in which studies can be conducted It has also consistently failed to account for all influences on learning. In innovative CAL environments, practical and theoretical development depends on the ability fully to investigate the wide range of such influences. Over the past five years, a customizable evaluation framework has been developed specifically for CAL research. The conceptual approach is defined as Situated Evaluation of CAL (SECAL), and the primary focus is on quality of learning outcomes. Two important principles underpin this development. First, the widely accepted need to evaluate in authentic contexts includes examination of the combined effects of CAL with other resources and influential aspects of the learning environment. Secondly, evaluation design is based on a critical approach and qualitative, case‐based research. Positive outcomes from applications of SECAL include the easy satisfaction of practical and situation‐specific requirements and the relatively low cost of evaluation studies. Although there is little scope to produce generalizable results in the short term, the difficulty of doing so in experimental studies suggests that this objective is difficult to achieve in educational research. A more realistic, longer‐term aim is the development of grounded theory based on common findings from individual cases

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: Universit of Wales Press
Year: 1997
DOI identifier: 10.1080/0968776970050107
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:230/core5

Suggested articles



  1. (1996). A Framework for Situated Evaluation of Learning in Computer Environments,
  2. (1990). Action Research for Change and Development, doi
  3. (1991). Animations need narrations: an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis', doi
  4. (1986). Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research, London and Philadelphia: doi
  5. (1992). Blocks to the effective use of information technology in higher education', doi
  6. (1996). CAL in human anatomy', doi
  7. (1991). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, doi
  8. (1989). Cognition and learner control: a literature review 1977-88',
  9. (1992). Computers in teaching and learning in UK higher education', doi
  10. (1993). Developing effective instructional graphics',
  11. (1986). Developments in ethnographic research in education: from interpretative to critical ethnography',
  12. (1994). Implementing multimedia based learning: today and tomorrow'
  13. (1988). Improving Learning New Perspectives,
  14. (1996). in press), 'CAL evaluation: what questions are being answered?', doi
  15. (1996). Integrative evaluation: an emerging role for classroom studies of CAL', doi
  16. (1996). Learning with technology (Australia)',
  17. (1986). Mental Representation: A Dual Coding Approach, doi
  18. (1991). Modes, media and methods: the search for educational effectiveness', doi
  19. (1993). Multimedia, constructivism and higherorder thinking skills'
  20. (1993). Multimedia: a gateway to higher order thinking skills'
  21. (1987). Schools computing and educational reform' in
  22. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning', doi
  23. (1987). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn', doi
  24. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory, doi
  25. (1993). The future of hypermedia-based learning environments: problems, prospects and entailments'
  26. (1988). The phenomenography of the mole concept in chemistry'
  27. (1981). Towards a better research framework for evaluating the effectiveness of educational media', doi
  28. (1979). Trends in research on student learning', doi
  29. (1995). Usability and beyond: evaluating educational effectiveness of computer-based learning'
  30. (1994). Whatever happened to instructional technology', paper presented to

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.