Location of Repository

Quality criteria for multimedia

By Nick Rushby

Abstract

The meaning of the term quality as used by multimedia workers in the field has become devalued. Almost every package is promoted by its developers as being of the ‘highest quality’. This paper draws on practical experience from a number of major projects to argue, from a quality‐assurance position, that multimedia materials should meet pre‐defined criteria relating to their objectives, content and incidence of errors

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: Universit of Wales Press
Year: 1997
DOI identifier: 10.1080/0968776970050203
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:239/core5

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1975). 29Nick Rushby Quality criteria for multimedia
  2. (1993). Evaluating interactive multimedia courseware - a methodology', doi
  3. (1992). Exploring open and distance learning, doi
  4. (1984). Producing Instructional Systems,
  5. (1975). Quality criteria for multimedia doi
  6. (1996). Report of the Task Force Educational Software and Multimedia (Working document of the Commission Services),
  7. (1994). The Performance Improvement Process:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.