Location of Repository

Personalizing the design of computer‐based instruction to enhance learning

By Hitendra Pillay, Wageeh Boles and Leonard Raj

Abstract

This paper reports two studies designed to investigate the effect on learning outcomes of matching individuals’ preferred cognitive styles to computer‐based instructional (CBI) material. Study 1 considered the styles individually as Verbalizer, Imager, Wholist and Analytic. Study 2 considered the bi‐dimensional nature of cognitive styles in order to assess the full ramification of cognitive styles on learning: Analytic/Imager, Analytic/ Verbalizer, Wholist/Imager and the Wholist/Verbalizer. The mix of images and text, the nature of the text material, use of advance organizers and proximity of information to facilitate meaningful connections between various pieces of information were some of the considerations in the design of the CBI material. In a quasi‐experimental format, students’ cognitive styles were analysed by Cognitive Style Analysis (CSA) software. On the basis of the CSA result, the system defaulted students to either matched or mismatched CBI material by alternating between the two formats. The instructional material had a learning and a test phase. Learning outcome was tested on recall, labelling, explanation and problem‐solving tasks. Comparison of the matched and mismatched instruction did not indicate significant difference between the groups, but the consistently better performance by the matched group suggests potential for further investigations where the limitations cited in this paper are eliminated. The result did indicate a significant difference between the four cognitive styles with the Wholist/Verbalizer group performing better then all other cognitive styles. Analysing the difference between cognitive styles on individual test tasks indicated significant difference on recall, labelling and explanation, suggesting that certain test tasks may suit certain cognitive styles

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: University of Wales Press
Year: 1998
DOI identifier: 10.1080/0968776980060203
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:271/core5

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1990). 31H/tendra Pillay et al Personalizing the design of computer-based instruction to enhance learning
  2. (1981). Categorisation and representation of physics problems by experts and novices', doi
  3. (1993). Children's Understanding: Development of Mental Models,
  4. (1979). Cognitive style and advance organizer in learning and retention', doi
  5. (1993). Cognitive style and GCSE performance in doi
  6. (1991). Cognitive styles and preferred learning mode, reading attainment and cognitive ability in 11 year old children', doi
  7. (1991). Cognitive styles: an overview and integration', doi
  8. (1989). Cognitive technology: some procedures for facilitating learning and problem-solving in Maths and Science', doi
  9. (1996). Computer-assisted learning and individual cognitive style preference in learning: does it matter?',
  10. (1991). Computers and educational systems',
  11. (1991). Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook, 3rd edition, doi
  12. (1991). Effect of restructuring training and cognitive style', doi
  13. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications', doi
  14. (1990). H/tendra Pillay et al Personalizing the design of computer-based instruction to enhance learning
  15. (1993). Individual differences in thinking: cognitive and neurophysiological perspectives', doi
  16. (1993). Knowledge engineering using HyperCard: a learning strategy for tertiary students',
  17. (1979). Learning style: an overview' in
  18. (1987). Learning styles implications for improving educational practices, Washington: Association for the Study of Higher Education. doi
  19. (1989). Mapping the structure of research and theory in instructional systems technology',
  20. (1993). Pseudoscience in computer-based instruction: the case of learner control research',
  21. (1990). Real and contrived uses of electronic mail in elementary schools', doi
  22. (1993). Reducing cognitive load in multimedia navigation',
  23. (1981). Styles of Learning and Teaching, doi
  24. (1993). Teacher stress and cognitive style', doi
  25. (1981). The assessment of verbal-imagery learning styles and their effect on the recall of concrete and abstract prose passages by eleven-year-old children', doi
  26. (1993). The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning', doi
  27. (1980). The relationship between extraversion and verbalimagery learning style in twelve-year-old children', doi
  28. (1994). The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment', doi
  29. (1988). The role of the student in learning from instruction', doi
  30. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material', doi
  31. (1992). Type of instructional material, cognitive style and learning performance', doi
  32. (1994). Will media influence learning? Refraining the debate',

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.