Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Learning relationships from theory to design

By C.J.H. Fowler and J.T. Mayes

Abstract

This paper attempts to bridge the psychological and anthropological views of situated learning by focusing on the concept of a learning relationship, and by exploiting this concept in our framework for the design of learning technology. We employ Wenger's (1998) concept of communities of practice to give emphasis to social identification as a central aspect of learning, which should crucially influence our thinking about the design of learning environments. We describe learning relationships in terms of form (one‐to‐one, one‐to‐many etc.), nature (explorative, formative and comparative), distance (first‐, second‐order), and context, and we describe a first attempt at an empirical approach to their identification and measurement

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: University of Wales Press
Year: 1999
DOI identifier: 10.1080/0968776990070302
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:306/core5

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1990). An introduction to the fifth anniversary collection',
  2. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relation to situated learning', doi
  3. (1997). Applying telepresence to education', doi
  4. (1987). Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems: Computational and Cognitive Approaches to the Communication of Knowledge, doi
  5. (1998). Best Distance Learning Graduate Schools: Earning your Degree without Leaving Home, Princeton Review: Random House.
  6. (1988). Cognition in Practice, Cambridge: doi
  7. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics',
  8. (1987). Cognitive principles in the design of computer tutors',
  9. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity, Cambridge: doi
  10. (1974). Culture and Thought: A Psychological Introduction, doi
  11. (1987). Learning in school and out', doi
  12. (1995). Learning technologies and Groundhog Day',
  13. (1999). Learning technology and usability: a framework for understanding courseware', doi
  14. (1995). Multilevel Statistical Models, doi
  15. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one', doi
  16. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Interaction, Cambridge: doi
  17. (1996). Problem-based learning: an instructional model and its constructivist framework',
  18. (1993). Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology, doi
  19. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning', doi
  20. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge: doi
  21. (1988). Social Identification,
  22. (1991). Social Influence, Milton Keynes: doi
  23. (1988). Social Structures: A Network Approach, Cambridge: doi
  24. (1997). Studying on-line social networks', doi
  25. (1983). The boundary specification problem in network analysis',
  26. (1997). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding', doi
  27. (1994). The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organisation, doi
  28. (1990). The re-emergence of learning theory within instructional research', doi
  29. (1999). Virtual university: real challenges',
  30. (1998). Why observing a dialogue may benefit learning', doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.