Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Evaluating learning and teaching technologies in further education

By Ann Jones, Jane Barnard, Judith Calder, Eileen Scanlon and Julie Thompson


With the current emphasis on quality assessment and the role of evaluation in quality assessment, it is likely that teachers in post‐compulsory education will increasingly be expected to evaluate their teaching, especially when making changes to their teaching methods. In Further Education (FE), there have been a number of developments to foster the use of Information and Learning Technologies (ILT), following the publication of the Higginson Report in 1996. However, there is some evidence that the adoption of ILT has been patchy

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: University of Wales Press
Year: 2000
DOI identifier: 10.1080/0968776000080307
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1997). 65Ann Jones et al Evaluating learning and teaching technologies in further education
  2. (1997). A framework for evaluating the use of educational technology',
  3. (1997). CAL evaluation: future directions', doi
  4. (1999). Computers in FE Biology: a study of how teachers' classroom practice can be affected by different software',
  5. (1997). et al Evaluating learning and teaching technologies in further education doi
  6. (1996). Evaluating CAL at the Open University: 15 years on', doi
  7. (1998). Evaluating communication and information technologies: a toolkit for practitioners',
  8. (1998). Evaluation using ethnography: context, content and collaboration',
  9. (1996). Integrative evaluation: an emerging role for classroom studies of CAL', doi
  10. (1988). ITMA's approach to classroom observation',
  11. (1998). Learning with computers: experiences from an evaluation project', doi
  12. (1994). Programme Evaluation and Quality: A Comprehensive Guide to Setting up an Evaluation System,
  13. (1998). Reflections on a model for evaluating learning technologies',
  14. (1996). Report of the Learning and Technology Committee, Further Education Funding Council.
  15. (1998). The Stationery Office doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.