Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Using electronic resources to support dialogue in undergraduate small‐group teaching: The ASTER project

By Frances Condron

Abstract

Learning through dialogue is an important element of UK higher education, supported by tutorial, seminar and workshop classes. Since 1998, the ASTER project has been exploring how Information and Communication Technologies support learning in small groups (http://cti‐psy.york.acuk/aster/). Electronic resources are developed and used in courses to support a wide range of learning needs, from delivery of content to interactive teaching tools and assessment. The manner in which they are integrated into a course dictates the extent to which they support and extend learning. The ASTER survey has identified the use of a range of new technologies to support learning through dialogue in a variety of contexts. Many of the uses are common across disciplines, though we have observed some differences in the range of tools used, and how they are implemented in and beyond the classroom. These differences are partly determined by the subject content of resources, and by the activities that ICT tools support. Another factor influencing this variation seems to be traditions of academic discourse. The findings suggest that educational technology needs to support both generic education practice, and the special needs of particular disciplines

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: University of Wales Press
Year: 2001
DOI identifier: 10.1080/0968776010090205
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:351/core5

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1999). A survey of current practice in the use of C&IT to support small-group teaching activities in disciplines associated with the humanities, physics, and psychology',
  2. (1989). Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines, Milton Keynes: doi
  3. (1996). Disciplinary differences in university teaching', doi
  4. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences', doi
  5. (1999). Why innovate? Some preliminary findings from a research project in teaching and learning in higher education', doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.