Location of Repository

Evaluating complex digital resources

By Canan Blake, Clare Davies, Ann Jones, Erica Morris and Eileen Scanlon

Abstract

Squires (1999) discussed the gap between HCI (Human Computer Interaction) and the educational computing communities in their very different approaches to evaluating educational software. This paper revisits that issue in the context of evaluating digital resources, focusing on two approaches to evaluation: an HCI and an educational perspective. Squires and Preece's HCI evaluation model is a predictive model ‐ it helps teachers decide whether or not to use educational software ‐ whilst our own concern is in evaluating the use of learning technologies. It is suggested that in part the different approaches of the two communities relate to the different focus that each takes: in HCI the focus is typically on development and hence usability, whilst in education the concern is with the learner and teacher use

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: University of Wales Press
Year: 2003
DOI identifier: 10.1080/0968776030110102
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:395/core5

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2002). An evaluation model for a digital library services tool', doi
  2. (1982). Barriers to the use of computer assisted learning', doi
  3. (1998). CTIGGM (Computers in Teaching Initiative: Geography, Geology and Meteorology)
  4. (2002). Enriching accounts of computer supported 14Avr-J Volume 11 Number I collaboration by using video data', doi
  5. (2002). Enriching accounts of computer supported Avr-J Volume 11 Number I collaboration by using video data', doi
  6. (2000). Establishing Relationships between Networked Technologies and Attainment,
  7. (1996). Evaluating CAL at the Open University: 15 years on', doi
  8. (1998). Evaluating communication and information technologies: a toolkit for practitioners',
  9. (2000). Evaluating information and communication technologies for learning in FE', doi
  10. (1997). Evaluating the effectiveness of multimedia computer modules as enrichment exercises for introductory human geography', doi
  11. (1977). How Do Students Learn: The UNCAL Evaluation, occasional publication no 5, Centre for Applied Research in Education,
  12. (1996). Integrative evaluation: an emerging role for classroom studies of CAL', doi
  13. (2002). Now you see it, now you don't: maintaining digital learning objects for the future', doi
  14. (1999). Predicting quality in educational software: evaluating for learning, usability and the synergy between them',
  15. (1994). Programme Evaluation and Quality: A Comprehensive Guide to Setting up an Evaluation System,
  16. (1998). Reflections on a model for evaluating learning technologies',
  17. (2003). The use and implications of ICT for supporting practical music skills in the school curriculum', paper to be presented at CAL
  18. (2002). Two approaches to enable the sharing and reuse of resources across institutions',
  19. (1999). Usability and educational software design: editorial', doi
  20. (1996). Usability and learning: evaluating the potential of educational software', doi
  21. (1999). Use of TLTP Materials in UK higher education: a HEFCE-commissioned study',
  22. (2002). Using video to enable effective collaboration between academic and software developers in the design and specification of educational software', paper presented at CALRG
  23. (1996). Varying the texture: a study of art, learning and multimedia',
  24. (1997). Virtual Fieldtrips, WWW site regarding 'virtual' fieldtrips or studies

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.