Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Closing the communications loop on the computerized peer‐assessment of essays

By Phil Davies


The use of self‐ and peer‐assessment is not new to higher education. Traditionally its use has required the complex and time‐consuming management of coursework submissions by the tutor, in an attempt to maintain validity and anonymity of the assessment process. In the last few years a number of computerized systems have been developed that are capable of automatically supporting, managing and performing the assessment process. The requirement for student anonymity and the release of the tutor from the process of marking have reduced the ability to develop the iterative process of feedback. This feedback is considered essential in supporting student learning and developing reflective practice. This paper describes the enhancement of a computerized assessment system to support anonymous computer‐mediated discussion between marker and marked having previously performed peer‐assessment. A detailed description is provided of the integrated assessment process, and an analysis of the use of this anonymous discussion is presented. Anonymous student feedback is presented and analyzed with respect to the perceived benefits of using the system with respect to enhancing the student learning process

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: University of Wales Press
Year: 2003
DOI identifier: 10.1080/0968776030110105
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1998). Assessment in partnership with learners', Assessment and Evaluation doi
  2. (2000). Computerized peer-assessment', doi
  3. (2000). Enhancing critical debate through web-based discussion and publishing',
  4. (2001). Feedback for web-based assignments', doi
  5. (1995). Improving feedback to and from students',
  6. (2002). In search of fairness: an application of multi-reviewer anonymous peer review in a large class', doi
  7. (2001). Must be more than Multiple Choice Tests for it to be academically credible?',
  8. (2001). Peer assessment: principles, a case, and computer support', paper at the LTSN-ICS workshop in Computer Assisted Assessment,
  9. (1995). Peer review: a precursor to peer assessment', doi
  10. (1994). Peer, self and tutor assessment: relative reliabilities', doi
  11. (1995). The art of assessing',
  12. (2002). The conscientious consumer: reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning', doi
  13. (1999). The use of self-, peer- and co-assessment in higher education: a review', doi
  14. (2001). Towards electronically assisted peer assessment: a case study', doi
  15. (2002). Using student reflective self-assessment for the awarding of degree classifications', doi
  16. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles', doi
  17. (1999). Why assess innovatively?',

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.