Location of Repository

Quality assurance for digital learning object repositories: issues for the metadata creation process

By Sarah Currier, Jane Barton, Rónán O’Beirne and Ben Ryan

Abstract

Metadata enables users to find the resources they require, therefore it is an important component of any digital learning object repository. Much work has already been done within the learning technology community to assure metadata quality, focused on the development of metadata standards, specifications and vocabularies and their implementation within repositories. The metadata creation process has thus far been largely overlooked. There has been an assumption that metadata creation will be straightforward and that where machines cannot generate metadata effectively, authors of learning materials will be the most appropriate metadata creators. However, repositories are reporting difficulties in obtaining good quality metadata from their contributors, and it is becoming apparent that the issue of metadata creation warrants attention. This paper surveys the growing body of evidence, including three UK-based case studies, scopes the issues surrounding human-generated metadata creation and identifies questions for further investigation. Collaborative creation of metadata by resource authors and metadata specialists, and the design of tools and processes, are emerging as key areas for deeper research. Research is also needed into how end users will search learning object repositories

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: Taylor Francis Ltd
Year: 2004
DOI identifier: 10.1080/0968776042000211494
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:616/core5

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1991). 991) Library and museum information: beauty and the beast,
  2. (2003). Available online: http://www.cetis.ac.uk/profiles/uklomcore (accessed 4
  3. (2003). Creating, using and re-using learning objects , presentation,
  4. (2003). Design and reusability of learning objects in an academic context: a new economy of education?
  5. (2003). Design and reusability of learning objects in an academic context: a new of education? USDLA Journal 17(1). Available online: http://www.usdla.org/html/ AN03_Issue/article01.html (accessed 4
  6. (2002). Draft standard for learning object metadata (New York,
  7. (2003). Engaging with the learning object economy, in: A. Littlejohn (Ed.)
  8. (2003). er is based on a research paper presented at ALT-C
  9. (2003). Granularization, in: A. Littlejohn (Ed.) Reusing online resources: a sustainable approach to e-learning (London,
  10. (2003). Implementing metadata collection: a project’s problems and soluearning technology, 5(1). Available online: http://lttf.ieee.org/learn_tech/issues/
  11. (2003). Implementing metadata collection: a project’s problems and solutions,
  12. (2003). IMS Digital Repositories Interoperability—core best practice guide, Version 1.0 final specification. Available online: http://imsglobal.org/ ositories/driv1p0/imsdri_bestv1p0.html (accessed 4
  13. (2003). IMS Digital Repositories Interoperability—core functions best practice guide, Version 1.0 final specification. Available online: http://imsglobal.org/ digitalrepositories/driv1p0/imsdri_bestv1p0.html (accessed 4
  14. (2001). IMS Learning Resource Meta-Data best practice and implementation guide, Version 1.2.1 final specification. Available online: http://imsglobal.org/ metadata/imsmdv1p2p1/imsmd_bestv1p2p1.html (accessed 4
  15. (2001). IMS Learning Resource Meta-Data best practice and tation guide, Version 1.2.1 final specification. Available online: http://imsglobal.org/ /imsmdv1p2p1/imsmd_bestv1p2p1.html (accessed 4
  16. (2003). Interoperability between information and learning environments: bridging the gaps: a joint white paper on behalf of the IMS Global Learning Consortium and the Coalition for Networked Information (Draft version,
  17. (2003). Interoperability between information and learning environments: the gaps: a joint white paper on behalf of the IMS Global Learning Consortium and tion for Networked Information (Draft version,
  18. (2001). Learning objects: resources for distance education worldwide, International research in open and distance learning. Available online: http://www.irrodl.org/content/ nes.html (accessed 4
  19. (2001). Learning objects: resources for distance education worldwide, International review of research in open and distance learning. Available online: http://www.irrodl.org/content/ v2.1/downes.html (accessed 4
  20. (1991). Library and museum information: beauty and the beast,
  21. (2002). Metacrap: putting the torch to seven straw men of the meta-utopia, E-learning guru newsletter. Available online: http://www.e-learningguru.com/articles/metacrap.htm (accessed 4
  22. (2002). Metacrap: putting the torch to seven straw men of the meta-utopia, E-learning wsletter. Available online: http://www.e-learningguru.com/articles/metacrap.htm 4
  23. (2003). Reusing online resources: a sustainable approach to e-learning
  24. (2003). Reusing online resources: a sustainable approach to e-learning (London,
  25. Reusing online resources: a sustainable to e-learning (London,
  26. (2003). Semantic web construction: an inquiry of authors’ views on collaborative metadata generation,
  27. (2003). Semantic web construction: an inquiry of authors’ views on tive metadata generation,
  28. (2001). SeSDL taxonomy evaluation report
  29. (2003). The Higher Level Skills for Industry Repository,
  30. (2003). The Higher Level Skills for Industry Repository, in: P. Barker & r (Eds) Case studies in implementing educational metadata standards (CETIS). Available http://metadata.cetis.ac.uk/guides/usage_survey/cs_hlsi.pdf (accessed 4
  31. (2003). The value of managing learning objects: an Intrallect ‘white paper’ (Livingston, Intrallect Ltd.). Available online: http://www.intrallect.com/products/intralibrary/ loms_value.pdf (accessed 4
  32. (2003). The value of managing learning objects: an Intrallect ‘white paper’ (Livingston, t Ltd.). Available online: http://www.intrallect.com/products/intralibrary/ ue.pdf (accessed 4
  33. (2003). using and re-using learning objects, presentation,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.