Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Building communities for the exchange of learning objects: theoretical foundations and requirements

By Rob Koper, Kees Pannekeet, Maaike Hendriks and Hans Hummel

Abstract

In order to reduce overall costs of developing high-quality digital courses (including both the content, and the learning and teaching activities), the exchange of learning objects has been recognized as a promising solution. This article makes an inventory of the issues involved in the exchange of learning objects within a community. It explores some basic theories, models and specifications and provides a theoretical framework containing the functional and non-functional requirements to establish an exchange system in the educational field. Three levels of requirements are discussed. First, the non-functional requirements that deal with the technical conditions to make learning objects interoperable. Second, some basic use cases (activities) are identified that must be facilitated to enable the technical exchange of learning objects, e.g. searching and adapting the objects. Third, some basic use cases are identified that are required to establish the exchange of learning objects in a community, e.g. policy management, information and training. The implications of this framework are then discussed, including recommendations concerning the identification of reward systems, role changes and evaluation instruments

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: Taylor Francis Ltd
Year: 2004
DOI identifier: 10.1080/0968776042000211502
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:617/core5

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003). 00) Online communities: designing usability, supporting sociability doi
  2. (2003). 003) European committee for standardization. Available online: http://www.cenorm.be/ index.htm (accessed 25
  3. (2003). 003) Extensible hypertext markup language. Available online: doi
  4. (2003). 003) Peer review of MERLOT learning materials. Available online: http://taste.merlot.org/ peer_review/
  5. (2003). 03) Advanced distributed learning. Sharable content object reference model. Available ttp://www.adlnet.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=scormabt (accessed 25
  6. (2003). 03) SoURCE: software use, re-use & customisation in education. Available online: w.source.ac.uk/ (accessed 25
  7. (2001). 1) Social exchanges for knowledge exchange Paper presented at Managing knowledge: ions and critiques,
  8. (2001). A university wide system for creating, capturing and delivering learning objects. Available online: http://reusability.org/read/chapters/south.doc (accessed 25
  9. (2001). A university wide system for creating, capturing and delivering learning vailable online: http://reusability.org/read/chapters/south.doc (accessed 25
  10. (2001). Advanced use case modeling (Upper Saddle River,
  11. (1999). Anatomy of exchange,
  12. (2003). Available Novemb Campbell, L online res
  13. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace , doi
  14. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace, doi
  15. (1998). Care in knowledge creation, doi
  16. (2003). Combining reusable learning resources and services with pedagogical purposeful UOLs, in: A. Littlejohn (Ed.) Reusing online resources: a sustainable approach to e-Learning (London,
  17. (1992). Complexity: the emerging science at the edge of chaos doi
  18. (1993). Creating community anywhere
  19. (2003). Design and reusability of learning objects in an academic context: a new economy of education?,
  20. (2003). Design and reusability of learning objects in an academic context: a new of education?,
  21. (2002). Designing instruction with larning objects,
  22. (1998). Distributed learning communities: an alternative to designed instructional systems,
  23. (1998). Distributed learning communities: an alternative to designed onal systems,
  24. (1999). E-tribalized marketing? The strategic implications of virtual communities on consumption, doi
  25. (1999). E-tribalized marketing? The strategic implications of virtual communities on tion, doi
  26. EE learning technology standardization committee WG4 digital rights expression language. online: http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg4/DREL_relevant_standards_survey-v4.doc (accessed mber 2003). 99) Multi-agent systems
  27. (1995). Emergence in social simulation, in:
  28. (2003). Engaging with the learning object economy, in: A. Littlejohn (Ed.) Reusing online resources: a sustainable approach to e-Learning
  29. (2003). Engaging with the learning object economy, in: A. Littlejohn (Ed.) Reusing ources: a sustainable approach to e-Learning (London,
  30. (2003). Extensible hypertext markup language. Available online: doi
  31. (2003). Extensible markup language. Available online: doi
  32. (2003). Extensible markup language. Available online: http://www.w3c.org/XML/ (accessed 25
  33. (2003). Fostering cooperation on the Internet: social exchange processes in e virtual consumer communities. Available online: http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/ 84_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf (accessed 25
  34. (2003). Fostering cooperation on the Internet: social exchange processes in innovative virtual consumer communities. Available online: http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/ LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf (accessed 25
  35. (2003). Identifying the complexity of factors in the sharing and reuse of resources, in: A. Littlejohn (Ed.) Reusing online resources: a sustainable approach to e-Learning
  36. (2002). IEEE learning technology standardization committee draft standard for learning object metadata, version 6.4. Available online: http://ltsc.ieee.org/doc/wg12/LOM_wd6_4.pdf (accessed 25
  37. (2002). IEEE learning technology standardization committee draft standard for learning tadata, version 6.4. Available online: http://ltsc.ieee.org/doc/wg12/LOM_wd6_4.pdf 25
  38. (2003). IMS Content Packaging. Available online: http://www.imsglobal.org/content/ packaging/index.cfm (accessed 25
  39. (2003). IMS learner information package specification. Available online: http://www.imsglorofiles/index.cfm (accessed 25
  40. (2003). IMS learning design specification. Available online: http://www.imsglobal.org/ esign/index.cfm (accessed 25
  41. (1995). Interpersonal relations: mixed-motive interaction, doi
  42. (1995). Interpersonal relations: mixed-motive interaction, Annual Review logy, 46, 183–207. 03) Combining reusable learning resources and services with pedagogical purposeful n: A. Littlejohn (Ed.) Reusing online resources: a sustainable approach to e-Learning ,
  43. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior doi
  44. (1999). Introduction, in: Swarm intelligence (Oxford, doi
  45. (2000). It is what one does: why people participate and help electronic communities of practice, doi
  46. (2000). It is what one does: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice, doi
  47. (2000). Knowledge markets: cooperation among distributed technical specialists, in: T. Srikantaiah & M. Koenig (Eds) Knowledge management for the information professional (Medford, NJ, Information Today).
  48. (2000). Knowledge markets: cooperation among ed technical specialists, in: T. Srikantaiah & M. Koenig (Eds) Knowledge management formation professional
  49. (1999). Multi-agent systems doi
  50. (2003). NovembBuilding communities for the exchange of learning objects: 35 IMS question & test interoperability specification. Available online: http://www.imsglouestion/index.cfm (accessed 25
  51. (2000). Online communities: designing usability, supporting sociability (Chichester, Wiley). Building communities for the exchange of learning objects: QTI doi
  52. (2003). Packaging. Available online: http://www.imsglobal.org/content/ g/index.cfm (accessed 25
  53. (2003). Project MERLOT: bringing peer review to web-based educational resources Available online: http://www.aace.org/conf/site/pt3/paper_3008_721.pdf (accessed 25
  54. (2003). Project MERLOT: bringing peer review to web-based educational resources online: http://www.aace.org/conf/site/pt3/paper_3008_721.pdf (accessed 25 er
  55. (1999). Relationship marketing: challenges for the organization,
  56. (2003). Sharing and re-use of learning resources across a trans-national network, in: A. Littlejohn (Ed.) Reusing online resources: a sustainable approach to e-Learning (London,
  57. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press). LD doi
  58. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation (Cambridge, ge doi
  59. (2001). Social exchanges for knowledge exchange Paper presented at Managing knowledge: conversations and critiques,
  60. (2003). SoURCE: software use, re-use & customisation in education.
  61. (2003). support for cooperative work. Available online: http://orgwis.gmd.de/projects/ (accessed 25
  62. (1998). The effects of recognition and group need on volunteering: a rm perspective,
  63. (1998). The effects of recognition and group need on volunteering: a social norm perspective, doi
  64. (1965). The logic of collective action
  65. (1998). The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation, doi
  66. (1959). The social psychology of groups doi
  67. (1992). The tree of knowledge: the biological roots of human understanding, dition
  68. (1992). The tree of knowledge: the biological roots of human understanding, revised edition
  69. (1999). The unified modeling language user guide
  70. (2000). The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier , revised edition doi
  71. (2000). The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier, revised edition dge,
  72. (1995). Trust (New doi
  73. (2003). ublin core metadata initiative. Available online:
  74. (2000). UML distilled , 2nd edn (Upper Saddle River,
  75. UOLs, i
  76. (2003). Usability evaluation of integrated e-learning, in: doi
  77. (2003). Usability evaluation of integrated e-learning, in: W. Jochems, erriënboer & E. Koper (Eds) Integrated eLearning
  78. (1994). What is mine is ours, or is it?, doi
  79. (2001). Writing effective use cases doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.