Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A short geostatistical study of the three-dimensional spatial structure of fumonisins in stored maize

By Monica Rivas Casado, David J. Parsons, Naresh Magan, R. M. Weightman, Paola Battilani and A. Pietri

Abstract

The heterogeneous three-dimensional spatial distribution of mycotoxins has proven to be one of the main limitations for the design of effective sampling protocols. Current sample collection protocols for mycotoxins have been designed to estimate the mean concentration and fail to characterise the spatial distribution of the mycotoxin concentration due to the aggregation of the incremental samples. Geostatistical techniques have been successfully applied to overcome similar problems in many research areas. However, little work has been developed on the use of geostatistics for the design of sampling protocols for mycotoxins. This paper focuses on the analysis of the two and three-dimensional spatial structure of fumonisins B1 (FB1) and B2 (FB2) in maize in a bulk store using a geostatistical approach and on how results help determine the number and location of incremental samples to be collected. The spatial correlation between FB1 and FB2, as well as between the number of kernels infected and the level of contamination was investigated. For this purpose, a bed of maize was sampled at different depths to generate a unique three-dimensional data set of FB1 and FB2. The analysis found no clear evidence of spatial structure in either the two- dimensional or three-dimensional analyses. The number of Fusarium infected kernels was not a good indicator for the prediction of fumonisin concentration and there was no spatial correlation between the concentrations of the two fumonisins

Publisher: Wageningen Academic Publishers
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.3920/WMJ2009.1178
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/6159
Provided by: Cranfield CERES
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2007). A combined three-dimensional geological-geostatistical-numerical model of underground excavations in rock. doi
  2. (1988). Aflatoxin distribution studies on a 4 tonne batch of maize. doi
  3. (2007). amending Regulation 1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs as regards Fusarium toxins in maize and maize products.
  4. (1995). Design of sampling plan for mycotoxins in foods and feeds. doi
  5. (2001). Determination of fumonisins B1 and B2 in corn and corn flakes by liquid chromatography with immunoaffinity column cleanup: collaborative study.
  6. (1995). Distribution of aflatoxin in Pistachios. 2. Distribution in freshly harvested pistachios. doi
  7. (1998). Distribution of fumonisins in maize ears infected with strains of Fusarium moniliforme that differ in fumonisin production. doi
  8. (2009). Geostatistical analysis of the spatial distribution of mycotoxin concentration in bulk cereals. doi
  9. (2000). Geostatistics for environmental scientists. doi
  10. (2007). Large to intermediate-scale aquifer heterogeneity in fine-grain dominated alluvial fans (Cenozic As Pontes Basin, northwestern Spain): insight based on three-dimensional geostatistical reconstruction. doi
  11. (2006). Laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of the levels of mycotoxins in foodstuffs.
  12. (2008). Logistic Regression Modeling of Cropping Systems To Predict Fumonisin Contamination in Maize. doi
  13. (2007). Mapping three-dimensional water quality data in the Chesapeake Bay using geostatistics. doi
  14. (2003). Modelling plant disease epidemics. doi
  15. (2009). Modelling the spatial distribution of mycotoxin concentration in bulk commodities to design effective and efficient sampling strategies. doi
  16. (2004). Novel sampling methods for the analysis of mycotoxins and the combination with spectroscopic methods for the rapid evaluation of deoxynivalenol contamination. doi
  17. (2006). Predicting aflatoxin and fumonisin in shelled corn lots using poor-quality grade components.
  18. (2006). Sampling foods for mycotoxins. Food Additives and Contaminants 23(1): 50–61.Figure 1. Schematic of the sampling locations and probe (not to scale) doi
  19. (2006). Setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs.
  20. (2003). Spatial and temporal statistics: sampling field soils and their vegetation. GeoEcology textbook. doi
  21. (1999). Spatial distribution and temporal development of fusarium crown and root rot of tomato and pathogen dissemination in field soil. doi
  22. (2003). Standardisation of mycotoxin sampling procedures: an urgent necessity. doi
  23. (1991). The variogram sill and the sample variance. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.