Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The water relations and irrigation requirements of sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum): a review.

By M. K. V. Carr and Jerry W. Knox

Abstract

The results of research on the water relations and irrigation needs of sugar cane are collated and summarized in an attempt to link fundamental studies on crop physiology to irrigation practices. Background information on the centres of production of sugar cane is followed by reviews of (1) crop development, including roots; (2) plant water relations; (3) crop water requirements; (4) water productivity; (5) irrigation systems and (6) irrigation scheduling. The majority of the recent research published in the international literature has been conducted in Australia and southern Africa. Leaf/stem extension is a more sensitive indicator of the onset of water stress than stomatal conductance or photosynthesis. Possible mechanisms by which cultivars differ in their responses to drought have been described. Roots extend in depth at rates of 5-18 mm d- 1 reaching maximum depths of > 4 m in ca. 300 d providing there are no physical restrictions. The Penman-Monteith equation and the USWB Class A pan both give good estimates of reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo). The corresponding values for the crop coefficient (Kc) are 0.4 (initial stage), 1.25 (peak season) and 0.75 (drying off phase). On an annual basis, the total water-use (ETc) is in the range 1100-1800 mm, with peak daily rates of 6-15 mm d-1. There is a linear relationship between cane/sucrose yields and actual evapotranspiration (ETc) over the season, with slopes of about 100 (cane) and 13 (sugar) kg (ha mm)-1 (but variable). Water stress during tillering need not result in a loss in yield because of compensatory growth on re-watering. Water can be withheld prior to harvest for periods of time up to the equivalent of twice the depth of available water in the root zone. As alternatives to traditional furrow irrigation, drag- line sprinklers and centre pivots have several advantages, such as allowing the application of small quantities of water at frequent intervals. Drip irrigation should only be contemplated when there are well-organized management systems in place. Methods for scheduling irrigation are summarized and the reasons for their limited uptake considered. In conclusion, the ‘drivers for change', including the need for improved environmental protection, influencing technology choice if irrigated sugar cane production is to be sustainable are summariz

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2011
DOI identifier: 10.1017/S0014479710000645
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/6321
Provided by: Cranfield CERES
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1988). A simple field method of scheduling irrigation.
  2. (1998). A simple visual aid for sugarcane irrigation scheduling. doi
  3. (1999). Advances in the science and economics of supplementary irrigation of sugarcane.
  4. (1998). Agricultural Water Management 17:180–207.Water requirements of sugar cane 23
  5. (1990). An assessment of drip irrigation of sugarcane on poorly structured soils in Swaziland. Agricultural Water Management 17:325–335. doi
  6. (2000). Assessing nitrogen application rates for subsurface trickle irrigated sugarcane at Bundaberg.
  7. (1995). Automatic plant extension measurement in sugarcane in relation to temperature and soil moisture. Field Crops Research 42:135–142. doi
  8. (1999). Benchmarking crop water index for the Queensland sugar industry. Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations,
  9. (1998). Changes in the components of cane and sucrose yield in response to drying-off of sugarcane before harvest. Field Crops Research 55:201–208. doi
  10. (1971). Comparisons of measured evapotranspiration of sugarcane from large and small lysimeters.
  11. (2008). Consortium for Sugarcane Modelling).
  12. (2003). Crop coefficients and water-use estimates for sugarcane based on long-term Bowen ratio energy balance measurements. Field Crops Research 83:125–138. doi
  13. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations, Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56,
  14. (2008). Deficit irrigation in sugarcane using the WaterSence scheduling tool.
  15. (2000). Determining the maximum drying off periods for sugarcane grown in different regions of the South African industry.
  16. (1985). Development of an irrigation policy to optimise sugar production during seasons of water shortage.
  17. (1997). Development of the centre pivot irrigation system in Mauritius.
  18. (1990). Drag-line irrigation. Practical experience with sugarcane. doi
  19. (1999). Drip fertigation – a means for reducing fertiliser nitrogen to sugarcane. Experimental Agriculture 35:31–37. doi
  20. (2002). Dry matter partitioning of sugarcane in Australia and South Africa. Field Crops Research 76:71–84. doi
  21. (2010). Enhancing irrigation management planning with EnviroScan and WaterSense. http://www.irrigation.org.au/assets/pages/762A58E3-1708-51EBA69E09D5747B3C06/82%20-%20Haines%20Paper.pdf [Accessed
  22. (2005). Evaluation of the sap flow determined with a heat balance method to measure the transpiration of a sugarcane canopy. doi
  23. (1990). Experience with approximately 600 hectare drip irrigation at Simunye sugar estate, doi
  24. (1996). Explaining irrigation technology choices: a microparameter approach. doi
  25. G (1963).The estimation of the water requirements of sugarcane in Natal.
  26. (2008). Global dataset of monthly growing areas of 26 irrigated crops: version 1.0. Frankfurt Hydrology Paper 6,
  27. (2005). Growth and function of the sugarcane root system. Field Crops Research 92:169–183. doi
  28. (1996). Growth of sugar cane under high input conditions in tropical Australia. I. Radiation use, biomass accumulation and partitioning. Field Crops Research 48:11–25. doi
  29. (2006). Impacts of irrigation return flows on the quality of the receiving waters: A case of sugarcane irrigated fields at the Royal Swaziland Sugar Corporation (RSSC) doi
  30. (1990). Importance of irrigation regime, dripline placement and row spacing in the drip irrigation of sugarcane. doi
  31. (1987). irrigation of sugarcane on a poorly draining saline/sodic soil.
  32. (1977). Irrigation of Sugarcane.
  33. (1956). Meteorology, evaporation and the water requirements of sugar cane.
  34. (2010). Modelling water uptake, growth and sucrose accumulation of sugarcane subjected to water stress. Field Crops Research 117:59–69. doi
  35. (1987). MSIRI-IH Drip Irrigation Research Project: Second Ratoon Crop Interim Report. Mauritius Sugar Industry Research Institute, doi
  36. (1963). On the relationship between water and sugar cane yield in Hawaii. doi
  37. (1997). Opportunities for amelioration of soil physical and chemical constraints under intensive cropping.
  38. (1997). Opportunities for improving the use of limited water by the sugarcane crop.
  39. (1999). Physiology and productivity of sugarcane with early and mid-season water deficit. Field Crops Research 64:211–227. doi
  40. (2002). Plant extension, soil water extraction and water stress in sugarcane.
  41. (1990). Plant water relations and irrigation management. doi
  42. (2006). Provision of irrigation scheduling advice to small-scale sugarcane farmers using a web-based crop model and cellular technology: a South African case study. doi
  43. (1990). Recent developments for improving water management in surface and overhead irrigation. doi
  44. (1967). Resposes of sugarcane to supplementary irrigation on two soils in Natal. Experimental Agriculture 3:223–238. doi
  45. (2004). Scheduling water application on drip irrigated sugarcane. doi
  46. (1985). Seeds of Change: Five Plants that Transformed Mankind. London: Sidgwick and Jackson Ltd. doi
  47. (1990). Soil water status: a concept for characterising soil water conditions beneath a drip irrigated row crop. doi
  48. (2009). Source-sink differences in genotypes and water regimes influencing sucrose accumulation in sugarcane stalks. doi
  49. (1989). Stomatal control of transpiration from a developing sugarcane canopy. Plant, Cell and Environment 12:635–642. doi
  50. (1999). Sugar cane root growth and relationships to above ground biomass.
  51. (1976). Sugar cane. doi
  52. (1984). Sugar-cane as an irrigated crop.
  53. (2007). Sugar, Oil and Fibre. doi
  54. (1989). Sugarcane anatomy, morphology and physiology. doi
  55. (2004). Sugarcane water stress criteria for irrigation and drying off. doi
  56. (1990). Sugarcane. In Irrigation of Agricultural Crops (Eds.
  57. (2004). Survey of irrigation scheduling practices in the South African sugar industry.
  58. (1994). Temperature and seasonal effects on canopy development and light interception of sugarcane. doi
  59. (1990). The control of drip irrigation of sugarcane using ‘index’ tensiometers, some comparisons with control by the water budget method. doi
  60. (1986). The effects of water stress during the formative phase on stomatal resistance and leaf water potential and its relationship with yield in ten sugarcane varieties. Field Crops Research 13:345–353. doi
  61. (1967). The estimation of cane root development and distribution using radiophosphorous.
  62. (1968). The Growing of Sugar Cane. doi
  63. (1986). The reaction of two varieties of sugarcane to water stress. Field Crops Research 14:15–28. doi
  64. (2006). The response of sugar cane canopy development to water stress. Field Crops Research 98:91–97. doi
  65. (1967). The simultaneous production of sugar cane roots and tops in relation to soil and climate.
  66. (2009). The water relations and irrigation requirements of banana (MUSA spp.). Experimental Agriculture 45:333–371. doi
  67. (2001). The water relations and irrigation requirements of coffee. doi
  68. (1990). tolerance of sugarcane to water stress during the main development phases. doi
  69. (1998). Tropical crops and their improvement.
  70. (1972). Tropical Crops: Monocotyledons. London: Longman. Qureshi,M.E.Wegener,M.K.,Harrison,S.R.andBristow,K.L.(2001).Economicevaluationofalternativeirrigation systems for sugarcane in the Burdekin delta in north Queensland, Australia.
  71. (1968). Water duty experiments with sugarcane on two soils in Natal. Experimental Agriculture 4:295–310. doi
  72. (2005). Water relations in sugarcane and response to water deficits. Field Crops Research 92:185–202. doi
  73. (2000). Water stress during different sugarcane growth periods on yield and responses to N fertilisation. doi
  74. (1976). Water use by sugarcane. Review paper No. 8. The South African Sugar Journal 60:593–600, 627–635.Water requirements of sugar cane 25
  75. (1986). Water use efficiencies in relation to sugarcane yields. Soil Use and Management 2:70–76. doi
  76. (1979). Yield response to water. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.