Location of Repository

Motivation and mobile devices: exploring the role of appropriation and coping strategies

By Ann Jones and Kim Issroff


There has been interest recently in how mobile devices may be motivating forces in the right contexts: for example, one of the themes for the IADIS International Conference on Mobile Learning in 2007 was ‘Affective Factors in Learning with Mobile Devices’ (http://www.mlearningconf. org). The authors have previously proposed six aspects of learning with mobile devices in informal contexts that might be motivating: control over learners’ goals, ownership, fun, communication, learning-in-context and continuity between contexts. How do these motivational features relate to theoretical accounts of what motivates people to use mobile devices and learn in technology- rich contexts? In this exploratory paper we consider two different candidates for such theoretical approaches. One is technology appropriation—the process by which technology or particular technological artefacts are adopted and shaped in use. Two different approaches to technology appropriation are discussed in order to explore the relationship between the different aspects of appropriation and motivation; that of Carroll et al. and that of Waycott. Both appropriation frameworks have been developed in the context of using mobile devices, but neither has a specific focus on learning. By contrast, the second theoretical approach is Järvelä et al.’s model of coping strategies, which is specifically concerned with learning with technologies, although not with mobile technologies in particular. The paper draws on case-study data in order to illustrate and discuss the extent to which these two approaches are helpful in informing our understanding of the motivating features of using mobile devices for informal learning

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Ltd
Year: 2007
DOI identifier: 10.1080/09687760701673675
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:728/core5

Suggested articles



  1. (Eds) The Sage Handbook of E-learning Research doi
  2. (2007). A theory of Learning for the Mobile Age,
  3. (2007). A theory of Learning for the Mobile Age, in:
  4. (2007). Affect and mobile technologies: case studies, paper presented at the Beyond Mobile Learning Workshop,
  5. (2007). Affect and mobile technologies: case studies, paper presented at the Beyond Mobile Learning Workshop, Kaleidoscope Network of Excellence,
  6. (2005). Appropriating tools and shaping activities: the use of PDAs in the workplace, in: A. Lasen & L. Hamill (Eds) Mobile World: Past, Present and Future (Springer-Verlag London doi
  7. (1982). Barriers to the use of computer assisted learning, doi
  8. (2006). Evaluation of a mobile learning organizer for university students, doi
  9. (2007). Going with the grain: mobile devices in practice,
  10. (2006). Informal learning, in: doi
  11. (2002). Just what do the youth of today want? Technology appropriation by young people, doi
  12. (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: what do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses?, doi
  13. (2007). Mobile usability in educational contexts: what have we learnt?,
  14. (2000). Motivation and the ecology of collaborative learning, in:
  15. (2003). Personal digital assistants in medical education and practice,
  16. (2002). Requirements for the design of lifelong learning organisers, in: doi
  17. (2005). Should there be a future for Tablet PCs in schools?,
  18. (2000). Socioemotional orientation as a mediating variable in teaching learning interaction: implications for instructional design,
  19. (1979). The adult’s learning projects (Ontario, Ontario Institute for Studies
  20. (2004). The appropriation of PDAs as learning and workplace tools: an activity theory perspective.
  21. (2006). Using mobile devices for learning in informal settings: is it motivating?, paper presented at the

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.