Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Promoting entrepreneurship as a means to foster economic development :|ba review of market failure and public policy

By Reabetswe Kgoroeadira

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Governments and policy makers continue to look to entrepreneurship as a vehicle to economic development. This is informed by the perception shared by governments and policy makers that entrepreneurship is a good thing and we ought to have more of it. Thus a wave of policies has emerged in the UK and elsewhere which advocates for an increase in the level of enterprise activity. Our understanding of how and when governments intervene to assist entrepreneurs, and indeed which, if any, specific entrepreneurs should receive assistance in some shape or form, still has substantial knowledge gaps. The review aims to contribute to the building of this knowledge. Methodology: The systematic review methodology was followed to examine the entrepreneurship literature. Quantitatively, the data was examined using basic descriptive statistics and content analysis. Qualitatively, the data was analyzed based on an inductive approach in order to identify emerging, frequent, dominant or significant themes that dominate in understanding entrepreneurship. Findings: This review has identified factors which affect entrepreneurial performance, the market failure that result as well as the policy instruments defined in literature that aim to rectify the perceived market failure. Different typologies were identified which illustrate how the different policy instruments are categorised. Further, this review highlights the complex nature of public policy and entrepreneurship and raises the importance of adopting a more coherent “holistic” approach when advocating for intervention in entrepreneurship and public policy

Topics: Entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial activity, market failure, public policy
Publisher: Cranfield University
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/6901
Provided by: Cranfield CERES

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2010). (2008),”Economic theory of the entrepreneurs: A systematic review of literature”, Cranfield University, Unpublished, Last accessed 22
  2. (1990). A Review of Small Business Employment Data Bases in the United Kingdom", doi
  3. (2006). A rough guide to Entrepreneurship Policy”, in Handbook of Entrepreneurship policy edited by Thurik,R and Audretsch.DB and Grilo I, Edward doi
  4. (1996). A Time Series Model of Self-employment under Uncertainty", doi
  5. (2005). An Analysis of the Impact of Affirmative Action Programs on Self-Employment in the Construction Industry," IZA Discussion Papers 1856, Institute for the Study of Labor doi
  6. Benchmarking of growth drivers’, doi
  7. (1992). Cartography of science: scientometric mapping with multidimensional scaling methods”.
  8. (2005). Determinants of entrepreneurial engagement levels doi
  9. (1997). Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach", doi
  10. (1988). Entrepreneurs and public-sector employees: the role of achievement motivation and risk in occupational choice”, doi
  11. (2000). Entrepreneurship and Bank Credit Availability", doi
  12. (2002). Entrepreneurship and Economic Performance: a Macro Perspective",
  13. (1999). Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Development in Transition Economies: Policy Guidelines and Recommendations,
  14. (2008). Entrepreneurship and Urban Success: Toward a Policy Consensus", SSRN Working Paper Series. doi
  15. (2007). Entrepreneurship Capital - Determinants and Impact", doi
  16. (2004). Entrepreneurship Capital and Economic Performance", doi
  17. (2007). Entrepreneurship in the UK", SSRN Working Paper Series.
  18. Entrepreneurship policy: what is it and where it came from”, doi
  19. (2008). Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions", doi
  20. (2002). Entrepreneurship, Growth and Policy, doi
  21. (2007). Entrepreneurship: A Survey of the Literature for Public Policy",
  22. (1998). Fostering Entrepreneurship, doi
  23. (1999). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor,
  24. (2000). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor:
  25. (2004). Global Report”,
  26. (2000). Institutional Determinants of the Prevalence of Startups and High-Growth Firms: Evidence from
  27. (2002). Investigation into Enterprise Support For Younger People, 1975–2000”, doi
  28. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth",
  29. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training program”. doi
  30. (1993). Models of Self-Employment in a Competitive Market," doi
  31. (2005). National Accounts, doi
  32. (1992). OECD Employment Outlook, doi
  33. (2004). on Action Plan: The European agenda for Entrepreneurship,
  34. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship",
  35. (2005). Prior knowledge, potential financial reward, and opportunity identification”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, doi
  36. (1998). Public policy measures to support new technology-based firms in the European Union", doi
  37. (1985). Seedcorn or Chaff? New Firm Formation and the Performance of the Interwar Economy “.The Economic History Review, doi
  38. (1982). Selection and the evolution of industry”, doi
  39. (1979). selection bias as a specification error”, doi
  40. (2001). Self-employment and windfall gains in Britain: evidence from panel data”, doi
  41. (1999). Six Steps to Heaven: Evaluating the Impact of Public Policies to support Small Businesses in Developed Economies”,
  42. (1999). Size of Investment, Opportunity Choice and Human Resources in New Venture Growth: Some Typologies", doi
  43. (1997). Small Businesses, Job Creation and Growth: Facts, Obstacles and Best Practices.
  44. (1989). Small-firm Entry in doi
  45. (2001). Technological opportunities and new firm creation”. doi
  46. (2002). The Dynamic Role of Small Firms: Evidence from the U.S", doi
  47. (2008). The Economic Benefits and Costs of Entrepreneurship: A Review of the Research ", doi
  48. (2004). The economics of self employment and entrepreneurship”, doi
  49. (2002). The Impact of Entrepreneurship on Economic Growth”. In Zoltan Acs doi
  50. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research", doi
  51. (2010). Theories of Entrepreneurship: Alternative Assumptions and the Study of Entrepreneurial Action", doi
  52. (2004). to Growth: Supporting South Africa’s entrepreneurs”, CDE Policy Research, Report 12,
  53. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review", doi
  54. (1994). Understanding the small business sector”,
  55. (2008). What does “entrepreneurship” data really show?", doi
  56. (2001). What Is New about the New Economy: Sources of Growth in the Managed and Entrepreneurial”, doi
  57. (2007). What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research", doi
  58. (2005). Youth entrepreneurship: latent entrepreneurship, market failure and enterprise support”, NCGE Discussion Paper,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.