Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Development and validation of a self-report measure of bus driver behaviour

By Lisa Dorn, Lucy Stephen, Anders E. af Wahlberg and Julie Gandolfi

Abstract

There are likely to be individual differences in bus driver behaviour when adhering to strict schedules under time pressure. A reliable and valid assessment of these individual differences would be useful for bus companies keen to mitigate risk of crash involvement. This paper reports on three studies to develop and validate a self-report measure of bus driver behaviour. For study 1, two principal components analyses of a pilot questionnaire revealed six components describing bus driver behaviour and four bus driver coping components. In study 2, test-retest reliability of the components were tested in a sub-sample and found to be adequate. Further, the 10 components were used to predict bus crash involvement at three levels of culpability with consistently significant associations found for two components. For study 3, avoidance coping was consistently associated with celeration variables in a bus simulator, especially for a time-pressured drive. Statement of Relevance:The instrument can be used by bus companies for driver stress and fatigue management training to identify at-risk bus driver behaviour. Training to reduce the tendency to engage in avoidance coping strategies, improve evaluative coping strategies and hazard monitoring when under stress may improve bus driver safety

Topics: bus driver crash driver behaviour traffic safety traffic accident record celeration behavior driving performance older drivers sample-size on-road stress prediction simulator risk
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1080/00140139.2010.532882
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/5239
Provided by: Cranfield CERES
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1997). A comprehensive questionnaire measure of driver stress and affect.
  2. (1992). A first course in factor analysis, 2nd Edition, doi
  3. (2001). A transactional model of driver stress. In doi
  4. (2007). Aggregation of driver celeration behaviour data: Effects on stability and accident prediction. doi
  5. (2003). An on-road study to investigate fatigue in local/short haul trucking. Accident Analysis and Prevention, doi
  6. (2003). Assessing the performance of older adult drivers: On-road versus simulated driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, doi
  7. (1996). Attentional processes, coping strategies and clinical intervention.
  8. (2009). Bus driver accident record; the return of accident proneness. doi
  9. (2007). Designing a psychometrically-based self assessment to address fleet driver risk, in
  10. (2005). Development of a psychometric measure of bus driver behaviour. Behavioural research in road safety: 14 th Seminar. Department for Transport,
  11. (2007). Development of a psychometric measure of police driver risk, PhD thesis,
  12. (2005). Development of the Police Driver Risk Index. In
  13. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS doi
  14. (2009). Driver Behaviour and Accident Research Methodology; Unresolved Problems.
  15. (2008). Driver celeration behaviour and accidents – an analysis. doi
  16. Driver celeration behaviour and the prediction of traffic accidents. doi
  17. (2008). Driver celeration behaviour in training and regular driving. In doi
  18. (1998). Driver stress and performance on a driving simulator. Human Factors, doi
  19. (1997). Driver stress and simulated driving: Studies of risk taking and attention.
  20. (2002). Driving performance in patients with mild to moderate glaucomatous clinical vision changes.
  21. (2005). Driving performance of glaucoma patients correlates with peripheral visual field loss. doi
  22. (1999). Driving simulation performance predicts future accidents among older drivers. doi
  23. (2002). Driving simulator validation for speed research. Accident Analysis and Prevention, doi
  24. (1998). Effects of experience and processing demands on visual information acquisition in drivers. doi
  25. Effects of passengers on bus driver celeration behaviour and incident prediction. doi
  26. (1998). Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. doi
  27. (1990). Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction? doi
  28. (1977). Evaluation of laboratory methods for the study of driver behaviour: Relations between simulator and street performance. doi
  29. (2009). Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes. doi
  30. (2003). Eye movements and hazard perception in police pursuit and emergency response driving. doi
  31. (1989). Fatigue and driving.
  32. (1999). Individual differences in driver stress vulnerability in a Japanese sample. doi
  33. (1991). Individual differences, stress and coping. In doi
  34. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analyses. doi
  35. (1991). Job Strain and Occupational Stress among Urban Public Transit Operators. doi
  36. (2007). Long-term prediction of traffic accident record from bus driver celeration behaviour. doi
  37. (2006). Measurement model quality, sample size, and solution propriety in confirmation factor models. doi
  38. (2005). Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. doi
  39. (1997). Motor vehicle accidents, fatigue and optimism bias in taxi drivers. doi
  40. (1998). Objective stress factors, accidents, and absenteeism in transit operators: A theoretical framework and empirical evidence. doi
  41. (2006). Patterns of driver stress and coping strategies in a Greek sample and their relationship to abberant behaviours and traffic accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, doi
  42. (1991). Personality correlates of driver stress. doi
  43. (1995). Prediction of mood and risk appraisals from trait measures: Two studies of simulated driving. doi
  44. (1989). Predictors of stress-related illness in city bus drivers. doi
  45. (2009). Professional and non-professional drivers‟ stress reactions and risky driving. Transportation Research Part F. Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. doi
  46. (2005). Professional driver training and driver stress: Effects on simulated driving performance. doi
  47. (1996). Psychiatric disorders and accidental injury. doi
  48. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. doi
  49. (1997). Sleepiness and driving: the experience of heavy goods vehicle drivers in the UK. doi
  50. Speed choice versus celeration behaviour as traffic accident predictor. doi
  51. (2003). Stress vulnerability and choice of coping strategies in UK bus drivers. In
  52. (2004). Stress vulnerability, coping and risk-taking behaviors during simulated driving. doi
  53. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. doi
  54. (2005). Stress, fatigue, health, and risk of road traffic accidents among professional drivers: The contribution of physical inactivity. doi
  55. (2008). The role of workload and driver coping styles in predicting bus drivers‟ need for recovery, positive and negative affect and physical symptoms. doi
  56. (2004). The stability of driver acceleration behaviour, and a replication of its relation to bus accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, doi
  57. (1999). the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. doi
  58. (1997). Time pressure, age and driving speed among bus drivers: A pilot study. Rapport till Vägverket [Report to the Swedish National Road Administration]. Available at www.psyk.uu.se/hemsidor/busdriver af Wåhlberg,
  59. (2002). Towards a transactional ergonomics for driver stress and fatigue. doi
  60. (1991). Traffic congestion, perceived control, and psychophysiological stress among urban bus drivers. doi
  61. (2003). Using a driving simulator to identify older drivers at inflated risk of motor vehicle crashes. doi
  62. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (4th Ed).
  63. (2009). Video-based road commentary training improves hazard perception of young drivers in a dual task. Accident Analysis and Prevention, doi
  64. (1999). Young novice driver subtypes: relationship to high-risk behaviour, traffic accident record, and simulator driving performance. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.