Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Auditing employee ownership in a neo-liberal world

By P. R. Knyght, Alexander Kouzmin, Nada K. Kakabadse and Andrew P. Kakabadse

Abstract

Purpose - Employee ownership has attracted much attention across the globe. Whether affected by the global financial crisis (GFC), or not, this paper seeks to canvass what is known about employee ownership in neo-liberal political economies. Design/methodology/approach - This paper is a literature review, cross cultural analysis and critique. Findings - The findings indicate future research directions. Research limitations/implications - The paper suggests a reconsideration of organizational configurations for possible greater application in the future. Social implications - The paper hightlights the re- regulation of neo-liberal markets. Originality/value - The paper focuses on employee share ownership schemes

Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1108/00251741011076807
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/5091
Provided by: Cranfield CERES
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003). A research model to investigate the organizational impact of an doi
  2. (2002). A stake in the outcome: Building a culture of ownership for the long term success of your business, Currency,
  3. A Statistical Profile of Employee Ownership”, National Centre for Employee Ownership, http://www.nceo.org/library/eo_stat.html http://www.nceo.org/esops/index.html (Accessed:
  4. A statistical profile of employee ownership", National Center for Employee Ownership,
  5. (2008). Banks and labour as stakeholders: Impact on economic performance”, IMF Working paper, International Monetary Fund doi
  6. (1982). Beyond stock options: Phantom stock, restricted stock, restricted stock Units, stock appreciation rights, and other equity alternatives doi
  7. (2003). Broad-based employee financial participation in the European Union", doi
  8. (2002). Broad-based employee stock options in U.S. ‘New economy’ firms", doi
  9. (1997). Characteristics of workplaces with financial participation: evidence from the WIRS’, doi
  10. (1980). Control in Organizational Analysis: The Lost Politics”,
  11. (2004). Cooperatives: Principles and practices in the 21st century, Cooperative Extension Publications,
  12. (1988). Correlates of employee satisfaction with stock ownership: Who likes an ESOP most?" doi
  13. (2004). Directors’ remuneration: The need for a geo-political perspective”, doi
  14. (2004). Does employee ownership enhance firm survival?" Employee Participation, Firm Performance and doi
  15. (2006). Does good governance include employee representation? Evidence from German corporate boards”, doi
  16. (1970). Effects of profit sharing plans on union organising efforts,"
  17. (2006). Employee financial participation: Evidence from a major UK retailer”’, doi
  18. (1978). Employee investment funds: An approach to collective capital formation, George Allen and Unwin,
  19. (1978). Employee ownerhsip and attitudes toward the union: An empirical study,” doi
  20. (2003). employee owners in ESOP firms: Human resource policies and company performance”, doi
  21. (2010). Employee ownership, board representation, and corporate financial policies”, Social Science Research January, doi
  22. (1997). Employee ownership, employee attitudes, and firm performance: a review of the evidence,’ doi
  23. (2002). Employee ownership, motivation and productivity, The Work Foundation,
  24. (1988). Employee ownership: Revolution or rip off? doi
  25. (2003). Employee participation and tax obstacles in the EU, European Federation of Employee Share Ownership (EFES),
  26. (2003). Employee participation in profit and ownership: a review of the area and evidence’, Luxembourg: European Parliament, Directorate General for Research: Working Paper,
  27. (1995). Employee participation, ownership and productivity: A theoretical framework’, doi
  28. (1987). Employee perspectives on stock ownership: Financial investment or mechanism of control”, doi
  29. (2005). Employee share ownership, employment relationships, and corporate governance’,
  30. (2005). Employee share ownership: safeguarding investments in human capital, doi
  31. Employee stock options fact sheet", National Center for Employee Ownership,
  32. (1987). Employee stock ownership and employee attitudes: A test of three models", doi
  33. (2008). Employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs)”, doi
  34. (1999). Employee stock ownership plans: Union influence and stakeholder interests", doi
  35. (1983). Employee-owned companies”, doi
  36. (2005). Equity: Why employee ownership is good for business,
  37. (2008). ESOPs grow significantly
  38. (2008). Federation of Employee Share Ownership),
  39. (1997). From phobias and ideological prescription: Towards multiple models in transformation management for socialist economies in transition,” doi
  40. (2009). Fundamentalism, Delusions and Epistemic Failure in Policy and Administration”, doi
  41. (2005). Home page", European Federation of Employee Share Ownership, Brussels, available at: www.efesonline.org,
  42. (1967). How to turn eighty million workers into capitalists on borrowed money, Random House,
  43. (2008). impact of employee-share-ownership schemes on performance in unionized and non-unionized workplaces”, doi
  44. (2003). In the company of owners: the truth about stock options (and why every employee should have them), Basic Books, doi
  45. (2002). In the company of owners: The truth about stock options and why every employee should Have them, Basic Books, doi
  46. (2006). Incentives, Monitoring, and Employee Stock Ownership Plans: New Evidence and Interpretations’, doi
  47. (1912). Industrial cooperation: The story of a peaceful revolution, Cooperative
  48. (2003). Innovation in small businesses: Culture and ownership structures do matter”,
  49. (2005). Intellectual capital, monitoring and risk: what predicts the adoption of broad-based employee stock options?" SSRN Working Paper Series. doi
  50. (2008). Leading the Board, doi
  51. (2007). Measuring performance: Differences between capitalist and labour-owned enterprises”, doi
  52. (2004). Monitoring colleagues at work: Profit sharing, employee ownership, broad-based stock options and workplace performance in the United States’, A paper presented at the Association doi
  53. (2006). Mutuality: Invaluable lessons from a classic model’, doi
  54. (2002). North American employee ownership survey results”,
  55. (2004). Ownership and the changing employment relationship: A comment on Rousseau and Shperling", doi
  56. (2004). Ownership and the changing employment relationship: Why stylized notions of labour no longer generally apply – a reply to Zardkoohi and Paetzold", doi
  57. (2005). Ownership reform amongst state firms in China and its implications”, doi
  58. (1970). Participation and work attitudes in Yugoslavia”, doi
  59. (1990). Paying for productivity - A look at the evidence, doi
  60. (2003). Pieces of the action: Ownership and the changing employment relationship", doi
  61. (1994). Privatization and popular capitalism, doi
  62. (1995). Producing sustainable competitive advantage through the effective management of people", doi
  63. (2004). Profit sharing, firm performance and union influence in selected European countries," doi
  64. (1997). reprinted 1999), Privatization surprises in transition economies: doi
  65. (1993). Review Essay” – Labour Relations in Eastern Europe: Organizational Design and Dynamics [(Petkov, K. and Thirkell, doi
  66. (2007). Shared Capitalism in the U.S. Economy: Prevalence, Characteristics, and Employee Views of Financial Participation in Enterprises’, Paper presented for the Russell Sage/NBER conference in doi
  67. (2003). Sharing ownership via employee stock ownership”, in doi
  68. (2000). Social partnership in Ireland: a view from below,"
  69. (2007). Stakeholder capitalism, corporate governance and firm value”, EFA doi
  70. (2008). Stakeholders and the composition of the voting rights of the board of directors”, doi
  71. (1996). stock ownership and corporate performance among public companies", doi
  72. (2003). Strategic stakeholder perspective to ESOP negotiations: The case of United Airlines”, doi
  73. (1992). The behaviour of worker cooperatives: the plywood companies of the Pacific Northwest",
  74. (1990). The effect of executive stock option plans on stockholders and bondholders", doi
  75. (2006). The fit of employee ownership with other human resource management practices: Theoretical and empirical suggestions regarding the existence of an ownership high-performance work system, or “Theory O”, doi
  76. (2008). The history of Coatbridge co-operative Ssciety, http://www.monklands.co.uk/CoatbridgeCo-operative/index.htm http://www.nceo.org/esops/index.html (Accessed:
  77. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance," doi
  78. (1989). The origins of economic democracy: Profit sharing and employee shareholding schemes, doi
  79. (2008). The PEPPER IV Report: Benchmarking of employee participation in profits and enterprise results in the member and candidate countries of the European Union (preliminary version for presentation to the European Parliament,
  80. (1998). The perceptions and effects of share ownership: Empirical evidence from employee buyouts", doi
  81. (1990). The performance effects of employee ownership plans”
  82. (1995). The productivity effects of employee stockownership plans and bonuses: Evidence from Japanese panel data",
  83. (2006). The relationship between financial participation and other forms of employee participation: doi
  84. (1978). The relative effects of share ownership versus control on job attitudes in an employee-owned company", doi
  85. (2005). The revival of profit sharing: cyclical recurrence or paradigmatic shift?"
  86. (1972). The sociology of Max doi
  87. (2002). The structure and performance consequences of equity grants to employees of new economy firms,” doi
  88. (1993). Theoretical and empirical studies of producer co-operatives: Will the twain meet?"
  89. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure", doi
  90. (1983). Trade Unions and Collective Capital Formation: A Review of initiatives in Western European Countries.
  91. (1992). Trends in ESOPs", in
  92. (1988). Unions and the incidence of performance-linked pay schemes in Britain’, doi
  93. (2001). Updating the determinants of firm performance: Estimation using the doi
  94. (2005). When employees have equity attitude, Harvard Business School Working Knowledge Series.
  95. (1995). Worker participation and productivity in labor-managed and participatory capitalist firms: a meta-analysis’, doi
  96. (2007). Workers enjoy fruits of their labor”,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.