Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Renewable hydrogen utilisation for the production of methanol.

By Cifre P Galindo and Ossama Badr

Abstract

Electrolytic hydrogen production is an efficient way of storing renewable energy generated electricity and securing the contribution of renewables in the future electricity supply. The use of this hydrogen for the production of methanol results in a liquid fuel that can be utilised directly with minor changes in the existing infrastructure. To utilise the renewable generated hydrogen for production of renewable methanol, a sustainable carbon source is needed. This carbon can be provided by biomass or CO2 in the flue gases of fossil fuel-fired power stations, cement factories, fermentation processes and water purification plants. Methanol production pathways via biomass gasification and CO2 recovery from the flue gasses of a fossil fuel-fired power station have been reviewed in this study. The cost of methanol production from biomass was found to lie in the range of 300–400 €/tonne of methanol, and the production cost of CO2 based methanol was between 500 and 600 €/tonne. Despite the higher production costs compared with methanol produced by conventional natural gas reforming (i.e. 100–200 €/tonne, aided by the low current price of natural gas), these new processes incorporate environmentally beneficial aspects that have to be taken in

Topics: Renewable electricity, Biomass, CO2, Energy storage, Methanol, Renewable fuels
Publisher: Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.
Year: 2007
DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.enconman.2006.06.011
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/1449
Provided by: Cranfield CERES
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2001). A comparison of the eco-efficiency of two production routes for methanol. Report ECN-I−01-003. The Netherlands: ECN (Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands);
  2. (2000). Advances in joint research between NIRE and RITE for developing a novel technology for methanol synthesis from CO2 and H2. Applied Organometallic Chemistry doi
  3. (2004). An investigation of the feasibility of coal-based methanol for application in transportation fuel cell systems. doi
  4. (2002). Benchmarking biomass gasification technologies for fuels, chemicals and hydrogen production.
  5. (2001). Bio-methanol as a fuel available from regional sources. In:
  6. (2002). Biomass combustion and co-firing: An overview.
  7. (2002). Biomass gasification to produce synthesis gas for fuel cells, liquid fuels and chemicals. Technology brief. IEA Bioenergy agreement, Task 33: Thermal gasification of biomass (2001-2003);
  8. (1999). Clean Coal Technology Programme. Commercial scale demonstration of the liquid phase methanol (LPMEOH) process. doi
  9. (1994). CO2 chemistry: An option for CO2 emission control? doi
  10. (1998). Comparison of CO2 sources for the synthesis of renewable methanol. doi
  11. (1997). Comparison of the renewable transportation fuels, liquid hydrogen and methanol, with gasoline – energetic and economic aspects. doi
  12. (1995). Coupled CO2 recovery from the atmosphere and water electrolysis: Feasibility of a new process for hydrogen storage. doi
  13. (1990). Department of Energy). Assessment of costs and benefits of flexible and alternative fuel use in the US transportation sector; technical report 5: costs of methanol production from biomass. doi
  14. (2003). Department of Energy). Commercial-scale demonstration of the liquid phase methanol (LPMEOH) process. Report No.DOE/NETL-2004/1199. Washington DC; USA: Office of Fossil Energy, doi
  15. (2002). economic and environmental assessment of aminebased CO2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control. doi
  16. (2003). Energy Agency). Renewables for Power Generation: Status and Prospects. doi
  17. (2000). Energy analysis of a CO2 recycling system. doi
  18. (2002). Environmental Protection Agency). Clean alternative fuels: Methanol.
  19. (1994). Environmental Protection Agency). Methanol basics. doi
  20. (2001). Future prospects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass. doi
  21. (1999). Hydrogen and carbon dioxide as raw materials for an ecological energy-technology. doi
  22. (1995). Hydrogen from remote excess hydroelectricity. Part II: Hydrogen peroxide or biomethanol. doi
  23. (2005). In: doi
  24. (1995). Methanol and hydrogen from biomass for transportation. Energy for Sustainable Development doi
  25. (2004). Methanol synthesis from carbon dioxide and hydrogen over Mn-promoted copper/zinc/zirconia catalysts. Reaction Kinetics and Catalysis Letters doi
  26. (2003). Methanol synthesis from fluegas CO2 and renewable electricity: A feasibility study.
  27. (2001). Performance analysis of a CO2 recycling system which utilizes solar energy. doi
  28. (2003). Preliminary screening − technical and economic assessment of synthesis gas to fuels and chemicals with emphasis on the potential for biomassderived syngas. doi
  29. (2001). Prospects for a hydrogen-solar energy system.
  30. (2004). Review and assessment of carbon dioxide emissions mitigation technologies. MSc Thesis. UK: School of Engineering.
  31. Securing renewable energy supplies through carbon dioxide storage in methanol. In: doi
  32. (2004). Squaring the circle: Sequestration of CO2 as liquid fuel. Paper presented at doi
  33. (2005). Synetix low pressure methanol (LPM) process.
  34. (1998). Synthesis of methanol from biomass/CO2 resources. doi
  35. (2003). Synthetic fuel production by indirect coal liquefaction. Energy for Sustainable Development doi
  36. (2003). Technology status review and carbon abatement potential of renewable transport fuels in UK.
  37. (1999). The Methanol cycle – sustainable supply of liquid fuels.
  38. (2005). The Starchem methanol process: A low cost route to methanol and power.
  39. (2005). Why biofuels? An introduction to the topic.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.