Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Support vector regression for warranty claim forecasting

By Shaomin Wu and Artur Akbarov


Forecasting the number of warranty claims is vitally important for manufacturers/warranty providers in preparing fiscal plans. In existing literature, a number of techniques such as log-linear Poisson models, Kalman filter, time series models, and artificial neural network models have been developed. Nevertheless, one might find two weaknesses existing in these approaches: (1) they do not consider the fact that warranty claims reported in the recent months might be more important in forecasting future warranty claims than those reported in the earlier months, and (2) they are developed based on repair rates (i.e, the total number of claims divided by the total number of products in service), which can cause information loss through such an arithmetic-mean operation. To overcome the above two weaknesses, this paper introduces two different approaches to forecasting warranty claims: the first is a weighted support vector regression (SVR) model and the second is a weighted SVR-based time series model. These two approaches can be applied to two scenarios: when only claim rate data are available and when original claim data are available. Two case studies are conducted to validate the two modelling approaches. On the basis of model evaluation over six months ahead forecasting, the results show that the proposed models exhibit superior performance compared to that of multilayer perceptrons, radial basis function networks and ordinary support vector regression models

Topics: support vector regression, warranty claims, foecasting
Publisher: Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.
Year: 2011
DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.03.009
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Cranfield CERES

Suggested articles


  1. (1996). A comparison of three strategies for forecasting warranty claims,
  2. (2007). A non-homogeneous Poisson process predictive model for automobile warranty claims, doi
  3. (2004). A tutorial on support vector regression, doi
  4. (1986). A useful generalization of renewal theory: Counting process govemed by non-negative markovian increments, doi
  5. (2005). A warranty forecasting model based on piecewise statistical distributions and stochastic simulation, doi
  6. (1992). An application of dynamic linear models for predicting warranty claims, doi
  7. (2010). An empirical compartison of machine learning models for time series forecasting, doi
  8. (2008). Application of machine learning techniques for supply chain demand forecasting, doi
  9. (2004). Bayesian analysis of discrete time warranty data, doi
  10. (2007). Finite-horizon prediction of recurrent events, with application to forecasts of warranty claims, doi
  11. (1996). Forecasting warranty claims, chapter 31, Product Warranty Handbook,
  12. (2005). Forecasting warranty performance in the presence of the 'maturing data' phenomenon, doi
  13. (2000). G-renewal process as a model for statistical warranty claim prediction, doi
  14. (1991). Methods for the analysis and prediction of warranty claims, doi
  15. (2002). New product warranty: A literature review, doi
  16. (1984). Repairable systems reliability. Modeling, inference, misconceptions and their causes, doi
  17. (2006). Robust classi and regression using support vector machines, doi
  18. (2010). Rough support vector regression, doi
  19. (2003). Support vector machine with adaptive parameters in time series forecasting, doi
  20. (1995). Support vector networks, doi
  21. (1995). The nature of statistical learning theory, doi
  22. (1988). The rate of failure is the density, not the failure rate, doi
  23. (1999). The Simple Genetic Algorithm: Foundations and Theory, doi
  24. (2011). Warranty claim analysis considering human factors, doi
  25. (2007). Warranty cost analysis for products with a dormant state, doi
  26. (1992). Warranty cost analysis, doi
  27. (1993). Warranty problem: its statistical and game theoretic aspects, doi
  28. (2009). Warranty spend forecasting for subsystem failures in uenced by calendar month seasonality, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.